H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lisa Raymond vs Sandra Cacic H2H: 1-1
Lisa Raymond and Sandra Cacic are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lisa Raymond leads 1–0 on carpet, while Sandra Cacic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandra Cacic won the 1995 Hilton Head third round 1-6 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 51
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 1995* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Sandra Cacic | 1-6 6-3 7-5 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Nov 10, 1994* | Philadelphia | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Lisa Raymond | 2-6 7-6 7-5 | Sandra Cacic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Raymond | #884 | #15 | 1,695 | 1,945 | 325 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lisa Raymond | Sandra Cacic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #257 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #55 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1996 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #17 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #28 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #29 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2003 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,631 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2006 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #128 | 1,580 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #884 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |