H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lisa Raymond vs Silvija Talaja H2H: 1-0

Lisa Raymond holds a 1–0 lead over Silvija Talaja in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lisa Raymond leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lisa Raymond won the 2003 Indian Wells Open round of 64 3-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lisa Raymond
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Silvija Talaja
CRO Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lisa Raymond #23 3-6 6-3 6-2 Silvija Talaja #94 Match data Mar 5, 2003 R64 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lisa Raymond #884 #15 1,695 1,946 327 273 54.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Silvija Talaja #1,214 #18 1,376 1,811 131 152 46.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lisa Raymond Silvija Talaja
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #449 1,496 0 0 1993 0–2 0.0% #288 1,481 0 0
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #336 1,480 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% #251 1,486 0 0
17 1991 2–1 66.7% #257 1,510 0 0 1995 0–3 0.0% #280 1,456 0 0
18 1992 7–6 53.8% #75 1,618 0 0 1996 9–4 69.2% #106 1,587 0 0
19 1993 13–12 52.0% #55 1,692 0 0 1997 2–4 33.3% #199 1,554 0 0
20 1994 19–17 52.8% #44 1,749 0 0 1998 7–6 53.8% #85 1,602 0 0
21 1995 25–16 61.0% #20 1,812 0 0 1999 32–22 59.3% #29 1,699 0 0
22 1996 23–19 54.8% #27 1,860 0 1 2000 25–28 47.2% #29 1,643 0 2
23 1997 31–21 59.6% #17 1,913 0 1 2001 9–18 33.3% #109 1,541 0 2
24 1998 29–21 58.0% #27 1,838 0 1 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,561 0 2
25 1999 22–23 48.9% #28 1,784 0 1 2003 15–21 41.7% #93 1,547 0 2
26 2000 26–20 56.5% #30 1,794 0 2 2004 10–14 41.7% #114 1,545 0 2
27 2001 33–21 61.1% #22 1,833 0 2 2005 2–6 25.0% #190 1,507 0 2
28 2002 29–21 58.0% #29 1,755 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2003 25–18 58.1% #27 1,766 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2004 20–19 51.3% #30 1,760 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 2005 14–19 42.4% #74 1,635 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2006 9–16 36.0% #128 1,581 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2007 0–1 0.0% #884 1,564 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lisa Raymond Silvija Talaja
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1991 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1992 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1996 — — — — 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1994 8 8 16 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1998 3 1 4 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1995 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 1999 6 7 13 46.2% 18 9 27 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1996 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 2000 11 15 26 42.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0%
23 1997 18 11 29 62.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 2001 6 10 16 37.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1998 13 9 22 59.1% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2002 14 13 27 51.9% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1999 8 12 20 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 2003 7 11 18 38.9% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
26 2000 6 8 14 42.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 2004 5 8 13 38.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2001 18 12 30 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2005 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2002 21 14 35 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 16 11 27 59.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 18 12 30 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 11 12 23 47.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 4 8 12 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 175 152 327 53.5% 45 48 93 48.4% 53 36 89 59.6% 54 37 91 59.3% — 54 72 126 42.9% 64 58 122 52.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 2 8 10 20.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lisa Raymond Silvija Talaja
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1989 1497 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.17 1993 1482 107.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 1–0 — -0.02
16 1990 1480 94.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.23 1994 1486 96.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 — — +0.23
17 1991 1511 107.5 — — — — +27 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 — — +0.30 1995 1456 101.4 — — — — — +52 — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.09
18 1992 1618 137.7 — — — — +26 — — 51.9% +0.15 1–0 0–2 — +0.38 1996 1588 117.3 — — — — — +65 — 62.1% +0.86 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.42
19 1993 1692 137.1 — — — — -34 — +15 54.4% +0.51 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.3 +0.84 1997 1554 99.9 — — — — — +85 — 38.5% -0.92 0–1 — — +0.70
20 1994 1749 138.6 — — — — -41 -122 -60 55.2% +0.24 5–10 (33%) 6–4 (60%) 98.6 +0.10 1998 1603 114.3 — — — — -33 +19 — 54.8% +0.32 2–3 (40%) 2–0 — +0.52
21 1995 1813 147.9 — — — — -6 — -76 56.0% +0.40 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) 107.8 +0.56 1999 1700 132.3 — — — — -87 +71 -46 57.5% +0.55 13–15 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 102.0 +1.18
22 1996 1861 149.8 — — — — 0 -246 -26 53.3% +0.25 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 101.3 -0.87 2000 1643 137.9 — — — — -51 +129 +73 45.8% -0.08 13–5 (72%) 3–4 (43%) 107.9 -2.17
23 1997 1913 159.1 — — — — +23 -242 -109 57.9% +0.55 9–8 (53%) 7–2 (78%) 104.2 -0.65 2001 1542 116.1 — — — — +25 +122 — 35.7% -0.87 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.2 +0.71
24 1998 1839 147.1 — — — — +16 -55 -97 56.9% +0.45 10–10 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 98.2 +0.54 2002 1562 119.3 — — — — +33 +31 — 47.4% -0.24 7–10 (41%) 5–3 (63%) 97.9 +1.04
25 1999 1784 143.4 — — — — +11 -60 -17 49.5% +0.06 9–10 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 98.1 -0.50 2003 1548 116.1 -2.31 -0.57 0.845 46.5% +6 +93 +47 44.0% -0.31 5–7 (42%) 3–6 (33%) 97.2 +0.68
26 2000 1795 141.6 — — — — -33 -118 +163 55.0% +0.43 9–8 (53%) 2–6 (25%) 96.1 -0.19 2004 1546 112.4 -0.46 -1.30 0.878 47.1% -22 +86 — 46.4% -0.21 4–6 (40%) 1–1 — +0.24
27 2001 1834 151.1 — — — — -13 -128 +181 58.1% +0.74 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 101.6 -2.05 2005 1507 106.7 -1.52 -3.11 0.524 38.5% -10 — — 33.3% -0.61 0–2 0–2 — +0.31
28 2002 1755 138.0 — — — — +6 -113 +316 54.5% +0.35 8–4 (67%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 1766 139.9 +1.58 +1.47 1.097 52.3% +23 -87 +216 53.8% +0.08 13–7 (65%) 7–4 (64%) 105.7 +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 1760 142.2 +2.54 -0.29 1.089 51.9% +66 -171 +175 48.9% +0.05 10–6 (63%) 4–2 (67%) 103.9 +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 1635 122.3 -3.26 -0.74 0.782 44.6% +87 -100 +170 43.2% -0.10 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.1 +2.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 1581 121.0 +0.78 -3.50 0.877 47.3% +54 -66 +220 35.2% -0.93 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 96.0 -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 1565 98.6 -2.01 +0.33 0.601 42.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 150.2 +0.86 -1.52 0.940 48.9% +12 -115 +91 53.0% +0.26 113–94 (55%) 71–64 (53%) 102.4 +0.25 — 1811 127.0 -1.33 -1.36 0.798 45.3% -16 +78 +13 47.5% -0.10 52–53 (50%) 23–24 (49%) 102.1 +1.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.