H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Lisa Raymond vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 3-2

Lisa Raymond holds a 3–2 lead over Tamarine Tanasugarn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 2–1 on grass, while Lisa Raymond leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2003 Birmingham fourth round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lisa Raymond
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 13, 2003* Birmingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Tamarine Tanasugarn #36 6-2 6-2 Lisa Raymond #23 Match data
Jun 18, 2000* Birmingham WTA 500 F Grass Lisa Raymond #28 6-2 6-7(7) 6-4 Tamarine Tanasugarn #59 Match data
Feb 3, 2000* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Lisa Raymond #27 6-1 6-4 Tamarine Tanasugarn #61 Match data
Jun 10, 1999* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Tamarine Tanasugarn #74 1-6 7-6 7-5 Lisa Raymond #38 Match data
May 29, 1997* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Lisa Raymond #24 6-1 6-1 Tamarine Tanasugarn #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lisa Raymond #884 #15 1,695 1,945 325 272 54.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lisa Raymond Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #449 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #336 1,480 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0
17 1991 2–1 66.7% #257 1,510 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0
18 1992 7–6 53.8% #75 1,617 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0
19 1993 13–12 52.0% #55 1,691 0 0 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0
20 1994 19–17 52.8% #44 1,749 0 0 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 1995 25–16 61.0% #20 1,813 0 0 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 1996 23–19 54.8% #27 1,859 0 1 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0
23 1997 31–21 59.6% #17 1,910 0 1 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0
24 1998 29–21 58.0% #27 1,837 0 1 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0
25 1999 22–23 48.9% #28 1,784 0 1 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2000 26–20 56.5% #30 1,795 0 2 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2001 33–21 61.1% #22 1,833 0 2 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1
28 2002 29–21 58.0% #29 1,755 0 3 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1
29 2003 25–18 58.1% #27 1,767 0 4 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1
30 2004 18–18 50.0% #30 1,746 0 4 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1
31 2005 14–19 42.4% #74 1,631 0 4 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2
32 2006 9–16 36.0% #128 1,580 0 4 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3
33 2007 0–1 0.0% #884 1,563 0 4 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4