H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lisa Raymond vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 2-0
Lisa Raymond holds a 2–0 lead over Virginia Ruano Pascual in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lisa Raymond leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Lisa Raymond won the 2000 Hilton Head third round 7-5 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2000* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Lisa Raymond | 7-5 3-6 6-2 | Virginia Ruano Pascual | Match data |
| May 24, 1996* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Lisa Raymond | 6-4 6-3 | Virginia Ruano Pascual | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Raymond | #884 | #15 | 1,695 | 1,945 | 325 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Virginia Ruano Pascual | #998 | #28 | 893 | 1,819 | 199 | 235 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lisa Raymond | Virginia Ruano Pascual | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #257 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #194 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #137 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #55 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #126 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #61 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #87 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #17 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #52 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #28 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2000 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2001 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #56 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2002 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #29 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #65 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2003 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2004 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2005 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,631 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2006 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #128 | 1,580 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #66 | 1,659 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #884 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #81 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #107 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #200 | 1,621 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 |