H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Liz Smylie vs Andrea Jaeger H2H: 0-1

Andrea Jaeger holds a 1–0 lead over Liz Smylie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Jaeger leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Jaeger won the 1983 Orlando round of 16 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Liz Smylie
AUS Age 63 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Andrea Jaeger
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Jaeger 6-1 6-1 Liz Smylie Match data Apr 22, 1983* R16 Orlando WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Liz Smylie #501 #20 29 1,823 161 189 46.0% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Andrea Jaeger #225 #3 — 2,266 257 90 74.1% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Liz Smylie Andrea Jaeger
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1979 2–2 50.0% — 1,522 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1980 62–18 77.5% #7 2,143 0 4
16 — — — — — — — 1981 61–18 77.2% #4 2,178 0 7
17 1980 11–4 73.3% — 1,630 0 1 1982 65–20 76.5% #3 2,201 0 9
18 1981 2–10 16.7% — 1,515 0 1 1983 50–18 73.5% #3 2,103 0 10
19 1982 15–8 65.2% — 1,628 0 3 1984 9–6 60.0% #42 2,024 0 10
20 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,754 0 4 1985 5–5 50.0% — 1,939 0 10
21 1984 13–18 41.9% #36 1,765 0 4 1986 0–1 0.0% #225 1,914 0 10
22 1985 16–19 45.7% #43 1,729 0 4 1987 3–2 60.0% — 1,899 0 10
23 1986 6–13 31.6% #114 1,668 0 4 — — — — — — —
24 1987 20–14 58.8% #27 1,747 0 5 — — — — — — —
25 1988 4–12 25.0% #153 1,607 0 5 — — — — — — —
26 1989 21–22 48.8% #66 1,681 0 5 — — — — — — —
27 1990 15–16 48.4% #53 1,665 0 5 — — — — — — —
28 1991 9–16 36.0% #116 1,612 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1992 0–1 0.0% #209 1,599 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1993 7–15 31.8% #125 1,549 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 1994 2–7 22.2% #192 1,515 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Liz Smylie Andrea Jaeger
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 25 4 29 86.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 14 7 21 66.7%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 8 3 11 72.7% 15 3 18 83.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 22 7 29 75.9%
17 1980 — — — — — — — — 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 1982 17 6 23 73.9% 15 4 19 78.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 22 6 28 78.6%
18 1981 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 12 9 21 57.1%
19 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 1984 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 1985 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1985 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 9 7 16 56.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1987 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1988 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1989 14 14 28 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1990 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1991 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 80 131 38.9% 11 19 30 36.7% 84 60 144 58.3% 13 29 42 31.0% — 65 21 86 75.6% 66 20 86 76.7% 50 14 64 78.1% 75 34 109 68.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Liz Smylie Andrea Jaeger
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1522 114.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 2144 166.9 — — — — -20 -413 -289 74.1% +1.97 7–3 (70%) 5–1 (83%) 111.4 -7.47
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 2178 174.5 — — — — +36 -158 -155 70.3% +1.78 15–5 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 106.9 -9.68
17 1980 1630 113.8 — — — — — — +68 63.6% +0.73 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) 103.1 +1.27 1982 2202 173.8 — — — — +57 -30 -141 74.7% +1.94 12–2 (86%) 7–2 (78%) 109.9 -8.09
18 1981 1516 99.0 — — — — +29 +16 +113 20.0% -1.68 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.93 1983 2104 170.1 — — — — -4 +148 +47 70.7% +1.71 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 96.2 -3.88
19 1982 1628 117.1 — — — — — +36 +61 59.3% +0.70 8–2 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 106.2 +1.87 1984 2024 144.8 — — — — +14 — — 65.5% +1.52 0–1 0–2 — -0.45
20 1983 1754 135.8 — — — — -168 -34 +79 54.4% +0.25 8–5 (62%) 3–3 (50%) 104.5 +2.10 1985 1939 112.7 — — — — +11 — — 47.6% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.47
21 1984 1765 122.9 — — — — -245 -129 +140 45.6% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.5 -1.24 1986 1914 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
22 1985 1730 128.1 — — — — -158 — +131 47.1% -0.38 7–8 (47%) 3–3 (50%) 99.5 -0.38 1987 1900 104.0 — — — — — +249 — 60.0% +0.70 2–0 — — +0.16
23 1986 1669 119.0 — — — — -124 -109 +185 38.5% -0.67 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 96.1 -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1987 1747 133.3 — — — — -128 — +164 57.7% +0.17 5–5 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.3 +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1988 1607 97.5 — — — — -90 — +200 25.7% -1.91 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 102.1 +1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1989 1682 124.8 — — — — -34 -171 +107 47.1% -0.16 10–6 (63%) 5–7 (42%) 101.1 +1.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1990 1665 124.3 — — — — +4 — +123 47.1% -0.23 7–3 (70%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1991 1613 115.0 — — — — -44 — +187 37.9% -1.31 4–4 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 103.0 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 1600 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 1550 117.2 — — — — -36 — +259 37.0% -0.70 4–6 (40%) 0–2 — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 1515 99.5 — — — — -31 — +232 31.6% -1.79 1–2 (33%) — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1824 127.3 — — — — -80 -43 +132 46.2% -0.37 67–54 (55%) 30–38 (44%) 100.0 +2.29 — 2266 172.3 — — — — +18 -41 -153 71.0% +1.72 44–18 (71%) 21–18 (54%) 107.9 -8.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.