H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Liz Smylie vs Andrea Leand H2H: 3-1

Liz Smylie holds a 3–1 lead over Andrea Leand in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Liz Smylie leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Liz Smylie won the 1990 Worcester round of 32 6-0 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Liz Smylie
AUS Age 63 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Andrea Leand
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Liz Smylie #57 6-0 6-1 Andrea Leand #141 Match data Nov 8, 1990* R32 Worcester Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Liz Smylie #55 6-1 6-2 Andrea Leand Match data Jun 26, 1985* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Andrea Leand 6-3 7-6 Liz Smylie Match data Dec 3, 1982* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Liz Smylie 6-1 6-3 Andrea Leand Match data May 16, 1981* SF Milan Bonfiglio WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Liz Smylie #501 #20 29 1,823 161 189 46.0% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Andrea Leand #857 #27 13 1,881 83 104 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Liz Smylie Andrea Leand
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1980 11–4 73.3% — 1,630 0 1 1981 4–3 57.1% — 1,563 0 0
18 1981 2–10 16.7% — 1,515 0 1 1982 29–22 56.9% — 1,812 0 0
19 1982 15–8 65.2% — 1,628 0 3 1983 17–18 48.6% — 1,784 0 0
20 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,754 0 4 1984 19–18 51.4% #35 1,774 0 1
21 1984 13–18 41.9% #36 1,765 0 4 1985 1–5 16.7% #33 1,681 0 1
22 1985 16–19 45.7% #43 1,729 0 4 1986 0–3 0.0% #214 1,627 0 1
23 1986 6–13 31.6% #114 1,668 0 4 — — — — — — —
24 1987 20–14 58.8% #27 1,747 0 5 1988 0–1 0.0% #296 1,607 0 1
25 1988 4–12 25.0% #153 1,607 0 5 1989 3–7 30.0% #152 1,579 0 1
26 1989 21–22 48.8% #66 1,681 0 5 1990 6–15 28.6% #142 1,516 0 1
27 1990 15–16 48.4% #53 1,665 0 5 1991 4–9 30.8% #180 1,504 0 1
28 1991 9–16 36.0% #116 1,612 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1992 0–1 0.0% #209 1,599 0 5 1993 0–2 0.0% #341 1,473 0 1
30 1993 7–15 31.8% #125 1,549 0 5 1994 0–1 0.0% #461 1,472 0 1
31 1994 2–7 22.2% #192 1,515 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Liz Smylie Andrea Leand
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1980 — — — — — — — — 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1981 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 8 17 52.9%
19 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 1983 7 3 10 70.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0%
20 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 1984 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
21 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1985 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 9 7 16 56.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1988 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
26 1989 14 14 28 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
27 1990 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1991 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1991 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1994 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 80 131 38.9% 11 19 30 36.7% 84 60 144 58.3% 13 29 42 31.0% — 37 36 73 50.7% 16 19 35 45.7% 10 18 28 35.7% 20 30 50 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Liz Smylie Andrea Leand
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1980 1630 113.8 — — — — — — +68 63.6% +0.73 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) 103.1 +1.27 1981 1564 118.3 — — — — +112 — — 55.6% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.64
18 1981 1516 99.0 — — — — +29 +16 +113 20.0% -1.68 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.93 1982 1813 151.1 — — — — +80 -158 -211 58.6% +0.34 6–10 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 102.1 -2.70
19 1982 1628 117.1 — — — — — +36 +61 59.3% +0.70 8–2 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 106.2 +1.87 1983 1785 132.5 — — — — +54 -45 -182 48.8% -0.18 7–7 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.5 -1.64
20 1983 1754 135.8 — — — — -168 -34 +79 54.4% +0.25 8–5 (62%) 3–3 (50%) 104.5 +2.10 1984 1775 142.9 — — — — +39 -6 -186 53.3% +0.21 6–10 (38%) 2–5 (29%) 91.3 -0.75
21 1984 1765 122.9 — — — — -245 -129 +140 45.6% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.5 -1.24 1985 1681 93.6 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.92 — — — +0.61
22 1985 1730 128.1 — — — — -158 — +131 47.1% -0.38 7–8 (47%) 3–3 (50%) 99.5 -0.38 1986 1628 92.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.83 — 0–1 — +0.24
23 1986 1669 119.0 — — — — -124 -109 +185 38.5% -0.67 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 96.1 -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1987 1747 133.3 — — — — -128 — +164 57.7% +0.17 5–5 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.3 +0.13 1988 1608 97.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.14
25 1988 1607 97.5 — — — — -90 — +200 25.7% -1.91 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 102.1 +1.27 1989 1579 123.9 — — — — +89 — — 34.8% -1.13 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.0 +0.47
26 1989 1682 124.8 — — — — -34 -171 +107 47.1% -0.16 10–6 (63%) 5–7 (42%) 101.1 +1.75 1990 1517 111.0 — — — — +34 — +59 29.2% -1.79 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.82
27 1990 1665 124.3 — — — — +4 — +123 47.1% -0.23 7–3 (70%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 +0.59 1991 1505 113.3 — — — — +4 — — 34.6% -1.46 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — +0.52
28 1991 1613 115.0 — — — — -44 — +187 37.9% -1.31 4–4 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 103.0 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 1600 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01 1993 1474 94.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.38
30 1993 1550 117.2 — — — — -36 — +259 37.0% -0.70 4–6 (40%) 0–2 — +0.46 1994 1472 108.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.32
31 1994 1515 99.5 — — — — -31 — +232 31.6% -1.79 1–2 (33%) — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1824 127.3 — — — — -80 -43 +132 46.2% -0.37 67–54 (55%) 30–38 (44%) 100.0 +2.29 — 1882 138.5 — — — — +56 -85 -134 46.4% -0.44 29–34 (46%) 15–19 (44%) 98.3 -0.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.