H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Liz Smylie vs Andrea Leand H2H: 3-1
Liz Smylie holds a 3–1 lead over Andrea Leand in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Liz Smylie leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Liz Smylie won the 1990 Worcester third round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 1990* | Worcester | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Liz Smylie | 6-0 6-1 | Andrea Leand | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1985* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Liz Smylie | 6-1 6-2 | Andrea Leand | Match data |
| Dec 3, 1982* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Andrea Leand | 6-3 7-6 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
| May 16, 1981* | Milan Bonfiglio | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Liz Smylie | 6-1 6-3 | Andrea Leand | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liz Smylie | #501 | #20 | 29 | 1,824 | 161 | 188 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Andrea Leand | #857 | #27 | 13 | 1,883 | 83 | 104 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Liz Smylie | Andrea Leand | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1980 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 29–22 | 56.9% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #35 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #36 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #33 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1985 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1986 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #114 | 1,669 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1987 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #27 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #152 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1989 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #142 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #180 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1991 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,599 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1993 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #125 | 1,550 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #192 | 1,515 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |