H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Liz Smylie vs Andrea Temesvari H2H: 2-1
Liz Smylie holds a 2–1 lead over Andrea Temesvari in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Liz Smylie leads 1–0 on carpet, while Andrea Temesvari leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Liz Smylie won the 1989 Worcester third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 60
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 1989* | Worcester | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Liz Smylie | 6-2 6-2 | Andrea Temesvari | Match data |
| Jan 4, 1989* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Liz Smylie | 6-3 7-5 | Andrea Temesvari | Match data |
| Apr 26, 1984* | Orlando | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrea Temesvari | 6-2 6-3 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liz Smylie | #501 | #20 | 29 | 1,824 | 161 | 188 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Andrea Temesvari | #932 | #7 | 109 | 2,021 | 185 | 178 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Liz Smylie | Andrea Temesvari | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1980 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 42–15 | 73.7% | — | 1,988 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1981 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1982 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1983 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #36 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,762 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1985 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1986 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #114 | 1,669 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #43 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1987 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #27 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1989 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1991 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,599 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,487 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1993 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #125 | 1,550 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #181 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #192 | 1,515 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,533 | 0 | 5 |