H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Liz Smylie vs Ann Henricksson H2H: 2-1
Liz Smylie holds a 2–1 lead over Ann Henricksson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Liz Smylie leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ann Henricksson won the 1987 Washington third round 4-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 1987 | Washington | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Ann Henricksson | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
| Dec 13, 1984* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Liz Smylie | 6-2 6-3 | Ann Henricksson | Match data |
| Jun 3, 1983* | Beckenham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Liz Smylie | 7-5 6-4 | Ann Henricksson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liz Smylie | #501 | #20 | 29 | 1,824 | 161 | 188 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Ann Henricksson | #892 | #36 | 21 | 1,756 | 147 | 210 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Liz Smylie | Ann Henricksson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1980 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1982 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1983 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #36 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #114 | 1,669 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #27 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #40 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #36 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1989 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #49 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #60 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1991 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #71 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,599 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1993 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #125 | 1,550 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #114 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #192 | 1,515 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #141 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #215 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |