H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Liz Smylie vs Beverly Mould H2H: 3-0

Liz Smylie holds a 3–0 lead over Beverly Mould in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Liz Smylie leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Liz Smylie won the 1984 Birmingham round of 64 6-4 6-4.

AUS Age 63 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
RSA Age 64 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Liz Smylie #76 6-4 6-4 Beverly Mould Match data Jun 13, 1984* R64 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Liz Smylie #68 6-2 4-6 7-5 Beverly Mould Match data Jan 26, 1984* R32 Pittsburgh WTA 250 Carpet
Liz Smylie 7-6 3-6 6-4 Beverly Mould Match data Jun 6, 1982* QF Beckenham WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Liz Smylie — #20 29 1,824 161 189 46.0% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Beverly Mould — #46 — 1,667 32 46 41.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Liz Smylie Beverly Mould
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1980 11–4 73.3% — 1,630 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1981 2–10 16.7% — 1,515 0 1 1980 1–1 50.0% — 1,504 0 0
19 1982 15–8 65.2% — 1,628 0 3 1981 7–7 50.0% — 1,520 0 0
20 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,754 0 4 1982 6–6 50.0% — 1,575 0 0
21 1984 13–18 41.9% #36 1,765 0 4 1983 5–6 45.5% — 1,600 0 0
22 1985 16–19 45.7% #43 1,730 0 4 1984 10–14 41.7% #46 1,647 0 0
23 1986 6–13 31.6% #114 1,669 0 4 1985 3–12 20.0% — 1,537 0 0
24 1987 20–14 58.8% #27 1,748 0 5 — — — — — — —
25 1988 4–12 25.0% #153 1,607 0 5 — — — — — — —
26 1989 21–22 48.8% #66 1,682 0 5 — — — — — — —
27 1990 15–16 48.4% #53 1,665 0 5 — — — — — — —
28 1991 9–16 36.0% #116 1,612 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1992 0–1 0.0% #209 1,599 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1993 7–15 31.8% #125 1,549 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 1994 2–7 22.2% #192 1,515 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Liz Smylie Beverly Mould
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1980 — — — — — — — — 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1980 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 1981 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
21 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1985 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 9 7 16 56.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1984 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1985 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1988 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1989 14 14 28 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1990 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1991 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 80 131 38.9% 11 19 30 36.7% 84 60 144 58.3% 13 29 42 31.0% — 10 17 27 37.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 12 15 27 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Liz Smylie Beverly Mould
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1980 1631 113.8 — — — — — — +66 63.6% +0.73 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) 103.1 +1.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 1516 99.1 — — — — +29 +16 +113 20.0% -1.68 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.89 1980 1505 99.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.23
19 1982 1629 117.0 — — — — — +36 +60 59.3% +0.70 8–2 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 106.2 +1.74 1981 1521 115.1 — — — — — — — 53.3% +0.83 0–2 0–6 (0%) — +1.07
20 1983 1755 135.9 — — — — -170 -34 +77 54.4% +0.25 8–5 (62%) 3–3 (50%) 104.5 +2.04 1982 1575 120.4 — — — — — +21 +30 55.2% -0.04 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.35
21 1984 1766 123.0 — — — — -246 -130 +139 45.6% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.6 -1.30 1983 1600 117.3 — — — — +19 +52 — 47.8% -0.30 0–1 1–0 — +0.37
22 1985 1730 128.2 — — — — -158 — +131 47.1% -0.38 7–8 (47%) 3–3 (50%) 99.5 -0.26 1984 1648 123.4 — — — — -41 — -2 41.8% -0.45 4–3 (57%) 4–2 (67%) 105.0 +0.30
23 1986 1669 119.1 — — — — -123 -108 +185 38.5% -0.67 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 96.1 -0.67 1985 1537 101.3 — — — — -36 — +81 25.7% -1.51 2–3 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.7 +0.95
24 1987 1748 133.3 — — — — -128 — +163 57.7% +0.17 5–5 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.3 +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1988 1607 97.6 — — — — -89 — +199 25.7% -1.91 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 102.1 +1.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1989 1682 124.9 — — — — -33 -171 +107 47.1% -0.16 10–6 (63%) 5–7 (42%) 101.1 +1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1990 1666 124.4 — — — — +4 — +122 47.1% -0.23 7–3 (70%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1991 1613 115.0 — — — — -43 — +187 37.9% -1.31 4–4 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 103.0 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 1600 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 1550 117.2 — — — — -36 — +259 37.0% -0.70 4–6 (40%) 0–2 — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 1515 99.5 — — — — -31 — +232 31.6% -1.79 1–2 (33%) — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1824 127.4 — — — — -80 -43 +132 46.2% -0.37 67–54 (55%) 30–38 (44%) 100.0 +2.21 — 1667 120.3 — — — — -27 +35 +24 43.8% -0.35 7–13 (35%) 9–12 (43%) 94.2 +4.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.