H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Liz Smylie vs Carling Bassett Seguso H2H: 0-2

Carling Bassett Seguso holds a 2–0 lead over Liz Smylie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Carling Bassett Seguso leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Carling Bassett Seguso won the 1984 Tampa round of 32 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Liz Smylie
AUS Age 63 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Carling Bassett Seguso
CAN Age 58 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Carling Bassett Seguso 6-3 6-3 Liz Smylie #67 Match data Oct 11, 1984* R32 Tampa WTA 250 Hard
Carling Bassett Seguso 6-4 6-2 Liz Smylie #53 Match data Aug 30, 1984* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Liz Smylie #501 #20 29 1,823 161 189 46.0% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Carling Bassett Seguso — — — 2,010 149 102 59.4% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Liz Smylie Carling Bassett Seguso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1982 2–3 40.0% — 1,521 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1983 35–21 62.5% — 1,832 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1984 37–20 64.9% — 1,940 0 1
17 1980 11–4 73.3% — 1,630 0 1 1985 30–17 63.8% — 1,880 0 1
18 1981 2–10 16.7% — 1,515 0 1 1986 18–12 60.0% — 1,847 0 1
19 1982 15–8 65.2% — 1,628 0 3 1987 16–12 57.1% — 1,831 0 2
20 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,754 0 4 1988 4–7 36.4% — 1,770 0 2
21 1984 13–18 41.9% #36 1,765 0 4 1989 3–4 42.9% — 1,756 0 2
22 1985 16–19 45.7% #43 1,729 0 4 1990 3–3 50.0% — 1,760 0 2
23 1986 6–13 31.6% #114 1,668 0 4 — — — — — — —
24 1987 20–14 58.8% #27 1,747 0 5 1992 1–3 25.0% — 1,729 0 2
25 1988 4–12 25.0% #153 1,607 0 5 — — — — — — —
26 1989 21–22 48.8% #66 1,681 0 5 — — — — — — —
27 1990 15–16 48.4% #53 1,665 0 5 — — — — — — —
28 1991 9–16 36.0% #116 1,612 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1992 0–1 0.0% #209 1,599 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1993 7–15 31.8% #125 1,549 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 1994 2–7 22.2% #192 1,515 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Liz Smylie Carling Bassett Seguso
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 12 6 18 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 9 3 12 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3%
17 1980 — — — — — — — — 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 1985 18 6 24 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
18 1981 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1986 8 6 14 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1989 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1985 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 9 7 16 56.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1988 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1989 14 14 28 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1990 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1991 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 80 131 38.9% 11 19 30 36.7% 84 60 144 58.3% 13 29 42 31.0% — 56 38 94 59.6% 49 23 72 68.1% 21 17 38 55.3% 23 24 47 48.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Liz Smylie Carling Bassett Seguso
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1521 110.0 — — — — +60 — — 50.0% -0.25 0–2 1–0 — +0.23
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1832 140.3 — — — — -64 -80 -107 59.8% +0.66 9–5 (64%) 7–4 (64%) 110.3 +0.14
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1941 159.0 — — — — -37 -6 -187 63.0% +0.84 7–6 (54%) 5–2 (71%) 104.1 -3.26
17 1980 1630 113.8 — — — — — — +68 63.6% +0.73 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) 103.1 +1.27 1985 1881 145.2 — — — — +31 +22 -161 61.3% +0.77 7–5 (58%) 2–4 (33%) 96.5 +2.09
18 1981 1516 99.0 — — — — +29 +16 +113 20.0% -1.68 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.93 1986 1847 143.9 — — — — -1 +75 -75 56.9% +0.43 7–5 (58%) 1–3 (25%) 98.7 -1.57
19 1982 1628 117.1 — — — — — +36 +61 59.3% +0.70 8–2 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 106.2 +1.87 1987 1832 140.5 — — — — -36 +154 -85 57.1% +0.49 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 99.9 -1.25
20 1983 1754 135.8 — — — — -168 -34 +79 54.4% +0.25 8–5 (62%) 3–3 (50%) 104.5 +2.10 1988 1770 121.3 — — — — -27 — — 41.7% -0.08 0–2 0–2 — -1.13
21 1984 1765 122.9 — — — — -245 -129 +140 45.6% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.5 -1.24 1989 1756 117.9 — — — — -30 — — 46.2% -0.77 1–0 0–1 — -1.02
22 1985 1730 128.1 — — — — -158 — +131 47.1% -0.38 7–8 (47%) 3–3 (50%) 99.5 -0.38 1990 1761 124.8 — — — — — +191 — 50.0% +0.07 1–1 — — -0.23
23 1986 1669 119.0 — — — — -124 -109 +185 38.5% -0.67 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 96.1 -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1987 1747 133.3 — — — — -128 — +164 57.7% +0.17 5–5 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.3 +0.13 1992 1729 109.6 — — — — — — — 22.2% -1.67 1–0 — — -0.51
25 1988 1607 97.5 — — — — -90 — +200 25.7% -1.91 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 102.1 +1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1989 1682 124.8 — — — — -34 -171 +107 47.1% -0.16 10–6 (63%) 5–7 (42%) 101.1 +1.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1990 1665 124.3 — — — — +4 — +123 47.1% -0.23 7–3 (70%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1991 1613 115.0 — — — — -44 — +187 37.9% -1.31 4–4 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 103.0 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 1600 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 1550 117.2 — — — — -36 — +259 37.0% -0.70 4–6 (40%) 0–2 — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 1515 99.5 — — — — -31 — +232 31.6% -1.79 1–2 (33%) — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1824 127.3 — — — — -80 -43 +132 46.2% -0.37 67–54 (55%) 30–38 (44%) 100.0 +2.29 — 2010 150.8 — — — — -15 +28 -122 58.0% +0.54 38–30 (56%) 20–19 (51%) 102.7 -2.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.