H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Liz Smylie vs Caroline Van Renterghem H2H: 1-0

Liz Smylie holds a 1–0 lead over Caroline Van Renterghem in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Liz Smylie leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Liz Smylie won the 1988 Adelaide International round of 32 5-7 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Liz Smylie
AUS Age 63 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Caroline Van Renterghem
BEL Age 54

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Liz Smylie #172 5-7 6-3 6-4 Caroline Van Renterghem Match data Dec 1, 1988* R32 Adelaide International WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Liz Smylie #501 #20 29 1,823 161 189 46.0% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Caroline Van Renterghem — — — 1,500 0 3 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Liz Smylie Caroline Van Renterghem
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 0–2 0.0% — 1,487 0 0
17 1980 11–4 73.3% — 1,630 0 1 1989 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
18 1981 2–10 16.7% — 1,515 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1982 15–8 65.2% — 1,628 0 3 — — — — — — —
20 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,754 0 4 — — — — — — —
21 1984 13–18 41.9% #36 1,765 0 4 — — — — — — —
22 1985 16–19 45.7% #43 1,729 0 4 — — — — — — —
23 1986 6–13 31.6% #114 1,668 0 4 — — — — — — —
24 1987 20–14 58.8% #27 1,747 0 5 — — — — — — —
25 1988 4–12 25.0% #153 1,607 0 5 — — — — — — —
26 1989 21–22 48.8% #66 1,681 0 5 — — — — — — —
27 1990 15–16 48.4% #53 1,665 0 5 — — — — — — —
28 1991 9–16 36.0% #116 1,612 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1992 0–1 0.0% #209 1,599 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1993 7–15 31.8% #125 1,549 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 1994 2–7 22.2% #192 1,515 0 5 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Liz Smylie Caroline Van Renterghem
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1488 104.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 — — -0.14
17 1980 1630 113.8 — — — — — — +68 63.6% +0.73 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) 103.1 +1.27 1989 1480 103.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.00 — 0–2 — -0.05
18 1981 1516 99.0 — — — — +29 +16 +113 20.0% -1.68 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1982 1628 117.1 — — — — — +36 +61 59.3% +0.70 8–2 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 106.2 +1.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1983 1754 135.8 — — — — -168 -34 +79 54.4% +0.25 8–5 (62%) 3–3 (50%) 104.5 +2.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1984 1765 122.9 — — — — -245 -129 +140 45.6% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.5 -1.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1985 1730 128.1 — — — — -158 — +131 47.1% -0.38 7–8 (47%) 3–3 (50%) 99.5 -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1986 1669 119.0 — — — — -124 -109 +185 38.5% -0.67 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 96.1 -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1987 1747 133.3 — — — — -128 — +164 57.7% +0.17 5–5 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.3 +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1988 1607 97.5 — — — — -90 — +200 25.7% -1.91 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 102.1 +1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1989 1682 124.8 — — — — -34 -171 +107 47.1% -0.16 10–6 (63%) 5–7 (42%) 101.1 +1.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1990 1665 124.3 — — — — +4 — +123 47.1% -0.23 7–3 (70%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1991 1613 115.0 — — — — -44 — +187 37.9% -1.31 4–4 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 103.0 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 1600 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 1550 117.2 — — — — -36 — +259 37.0% -0.70 4–6 (40%) 0–2 — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 1515 99.5 — — — — -31 — +232 31.6% -1.79 1–2 (33%) — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1824 127.3 — — — — -80 -43 +132 46.2% -0.37 67–54 (55%) 30–38 (44%) 100.0 +2.29 — 1500 103.8 — — — — — — — 14.3% -1.43 0–1 0–2 — -6.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.