H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Liz Smylie vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 1-3
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan holds a 3–1 lead over Liz Smylie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1991 Wimbledon third round 6-1 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 1991* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-1 7-6 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
| Apr 16, 1990* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-3 6-2 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
| Feb 14, 1987* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Liz Smylie | 6-4 6-4 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Mar 7, 1985* | Princeton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-4 1-6 6-1 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liz Smylie | #501 | #20 | 29 | 1,824 | 161 | 188 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Liz Smylie | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #36 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #114 | 1,669 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #27 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 |
| 1989 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| 1991 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 |
| 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,599 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 1993 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #125 | 1,550 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #192 | 1,515 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |