H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Liz Smylie vs Catherine Suire H2H: 3-1
Liz Smylie holds a 3–1 lead over Catherine Suire in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Liz Smylie leads 3–0 on grass, while Catherine Suire leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Liz Smylie won the 1991 Wimbledon second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1991* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Liz Smylie | 6-3 6-4 | Catherine Suire | Match data |
| Dec 31, 1987* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Liz Smylie | 6-1 3-6 6-2 | Catherine Suire | Match data |
| Nov 29, 1985* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Liz Smylie | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | Catherine Suire | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1984* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Catherine Suire | 6-2 6-2 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liz Smylie | #501 | #20 | 29 | 1,824 | 161 | 188 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Catherine Suire | #513 | #52 | 13 | 1,692 | 77 | 128 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Liz Smylie | Catherine Suire | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1980 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1982 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1983 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #36 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #114 | 1,669 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #27 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1989 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #84 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #135 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1991 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #124 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,599 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #139 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1993 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #125 | 1,550 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #192 | 1,515 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #213 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |