H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Liz Smylie vs Gretchen Magers H2H: 2-4

Gretchen Magers holds a 4–2 lead over Liz Smylie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Gretchen Magers leads 3–2 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Liz Smylie won the 1991 Eastbourne Open round of 32 7-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Liz Smylie
AUS Age 63 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main-draw meetings
Gretchen Magers
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Liz Smylie #99 7-6 7-6 Gretchen Magers #36 Match data Jun 20, 1991* R32 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Gretchen Magers #25 6-1 7-6 Liz Smylie #46 Match data Jun 27, 1990* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Gretchen Magers #32 6-1 7-6 Liz Smylie #39 Match data Jun 20, 1990* R64 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Gretchen Magers #24 6-2 6-4 Liz Smylie #57 Match data Mar 19, 1990* R32 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Liz Smylie #66 6-4 3-6 6-2 Gretchen Magers #88 Match data Jun 29, 1984* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Gretchen Magers #142 6-3 6-1 Liz Smylie #76 Match data Jun 20, 1984* R64 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Liz Smylie #501 #20 29 1,823 161 189 46.0% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Gretchen Magers #433 #3 40 1,905 152 127 54.5% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Liz Smylie Gretchen Magers
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1980 11–4 73.3% — 1,630 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1981 2–10 16.7% — 1,515 0 1 1982 4–1 80.0% — 1,608 0 0
19 1982 15–8 65.2% — 1,628 0 3 1983 9–6 60.0% — 1,689 0 1
20 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,754 0 4 1984 8–7 53.3% #81 1,706 0 1
21 1984 13–18 41.9% #36 1,765 0 4 1985 1–5 16.7% #3 1,644 0 1
22 1985 16–19 45.7% #43 1,729 0 4 1986 6–8 42.9% #70 1,666 0 1
23 1986 6–13 31.6% #114 1,668 0 4 1987 21–17 55.3% #52 1,713 0 2
24 1987 20–14 58.8% #27 1,747 0 5 1988 31–20 60.8% #43 1,756 0 3
25 1988 4–12 25.0% #153 1,607 0 5 1989 40–24 62.5% #29 1,891 0 4
26 1989 21–22 48.8% #66 1,681 0 5 1990 22–19 53.7% #35 1,771 0 4
27 1990 15–16 48.4% #53 1,665 0 5 1991 10–15 40.0% #114 1,649 0 4
28 1991 9–16 36.0% #116 1,612 0 5 1992 0–5 0.0% #390 1,591 0 4
29 1992 0–1 0.0% #209 1,599 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1993 7–15 31.8% #125 1,549 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 1994 2–7 22.2% #192 1,515 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Liz Smylie Gretchen Magers
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1980 — — — — — — — — 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1982 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 1983 1 3 4 25.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
21 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1985 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1985 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 9 7 16 56.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1986 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 11 5 16 68.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 22 12 34 64.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1988 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 19 12 31 61.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
26 1989 14 14 28 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1990 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9%
27 1990 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1991 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1991 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 80 131 38.9% 11 19 30 36.7% 84 60 144 58.3% 13 29 42 31.0% — 77 58 135 57.0% 28 27 55 50.9% 30 25 55 54.5% 16 17 33 48.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Liz Smylie Gretchen Magers
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1980 1630 113.8 — — — — — — +68 63.6% +0.73 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) 103.1 +1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 1516 99.0 — — — — +29 +16 +113 20.0% -1.68 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.93 1982 1608 127.4 — — — — +80 — — 64.3% +0.43 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — -0.37
19 1982 1628 117.1 — — — — — +36 +61 59.3% +0.70 8–2 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 106.2 +1.87 1983 1690 116.7 — — — — -22 -1 — 52.8% -0.08 5–1 (83%) 0–1 — +0.82
20 1983 1754 135.8 — — — — -168 -34 +79 54.4% +0.25 8–5 (62%) 3–3 (50%) 104.5 +2.10 1984 1707 119.6 — — — — -54 — -40 51.4% 0.00 3–4 (43%) 1–0 — -0.42
21 1984 1765 122.9 — — — — -245 -129 +140 45.6% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.5 -1.24 1985 1644 103.2 — — — — — -40 — 16.7% -2.17 — — — -0.32
22 1985 1730 128.1 — — — — -158 — +131 47.1% -0.38 7–8 (47%) 3–3 (50%) 99.5 -0.38 1986 1667 123.6 — — — — -7 — — 40.6% -0.56 3–3 (50%) 2–0 — -0.81
23 1986 1669 119.0 — — — — -124 -109 +185 38.5% -0.67 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 96.1 -0.61 1987 1713 137.3 — — — — +20 -82 -75 56.1% +0.48 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.78
24 1987 1747 133.3 — — — — -128 — +164 57.7% +0.17 5–5 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.3 +0.13 1988 1757 133.2 — — — — +16 -60 -137 57.6% +0.58 10–6 (63%) 10–7 (59%) 107.1 +2.74
25 1988 1607 97.5 — — — — -90 — +200 25.7% -1.91 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 102.1 +1.27 1989 1891 149.4 — — — — -10 -129 -183 58.3% +0.65 12–6 (67%) 9–8 (53%) 106.1 -1.97
26 1989 1682 124.8 — — — — -34 -171 +107 47.1% -0.16 10–6 (63%) 5–7 (42%) 101.1 +1.75 1990 1771 138.9 — — — — -17 -8 +111 53.2% +0.10 6–8 (43%) 8–3 (73%) 102.8 -1.04
27 1990 1665 124.3 — — — — +4 — +123 47.1% -0.23 7–3 (70%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 +0.59 1991 1650 122.9 — — — — +25 — +165 44.1% -0.27 3–6 (33%) 0–6 (0%) 90.1 +2.03
28 1991 1613 115.0 — — — — -44 — +187 37.9% -1.31 4–4 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 103.0 -0.32 1992 1591 98.0 — — — — +23 — — 9.1% -2.55 0–1 0–1 — -0.47
29 1992 1600 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 1550 117.2 — — — — -36 — +259 37.0% -0.70 4–6 (40%) 0–2 — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 1515 99.5 — — — — -31 — +232 31.6% -1.79 1–2 (33%) — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1824 127.3 — — — — -80 -43 +132 46.2% -0.37 67–54 (55%) 30–38 (44%) 100.0 +2.29 — 1906 140.6 — — — — +3 -59 -17 52.7% +0.20 47–40 (54%) 33–27 (55%) 106.7 -0.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.