H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Liz Smylie vs Julie Salmon H2H: 2-1
Liz Smylie holds a 2–1 lead over Julie Salmon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Liz Smylie leads 2–1 on grass. Most recently, Julie Salmon won the 1988 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 1988* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Julie Salmon | 6-4 6-4 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
| Jun 8, 1988* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Liz Smylie | 7-6 2-6 6-3 | Julie Salmon | Match data |
| Nov 16, 1983* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Liz Smylie | 6-3 6-3 | Julie Salmon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liz Smylie | #501 | #20 | 29 | 1,824 | 161 | 188 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Julie Salmon | — | — | — | 1,544 | 15 | 51 | 22.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Liz Smylie | Julie Salmon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1980 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #36 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #114 | 1,669 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,377 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #27 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,363 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,351 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1989 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,342 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1991 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,599 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1993 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #125 | 1,550 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #192 | 1,515 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |