H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Liz Smylie vs Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel H2H: 0-3
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel holds a 3–0 lead over Liz Smylie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel won the 1985 Wimbledon fourth round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 1985* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 6-2 6-1 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
| May 26, 1983* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 6-3 6-3 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
| Oct 22, 1981* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 5-7 6-3 6-3 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liz Smylie | #501 | #20 | 29 | 1,824 | 161 | 188 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Liz Smylie | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1980 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1981 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1982 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1983 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #36 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1985 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1986 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #114 | 1,669 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1987 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #27 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1989 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1991 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,599 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1993 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #125 | 1,550 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #192 | 1,515 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |