H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Liz Smylie vs Laura Arraya H2H: 2-2

Liz Smylie and Laura Arraya are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Laura Arraya leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1993 Japan Women's Open quarterfinal 4-6 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Liz Smylie
AUS Age 63 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Laura Arraya
PER Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Arraya #63 4-6 6-1 6-4 Liz Smylie #194 Match data Feb 14, 1993* QF Japan Women's Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Liz Smylie #54 6-3 2-6 9-7 Laura Arraya #24 Match data Jan 18, 1991* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Liz Smylie #48 2-6 7-6 6-3 Laura Arraya #17 Match data Jul 19, 1990* R32 Newport Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Laura Arraya 6-3 6-4 Liz Smylie Match data Oct 14, 1982* R32 Tokyo Borden WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Liz Smylie #501 #20 29 1,823 161 189 46.0% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Laura Arraya #192 #14 51 1,922 270 204 57.0% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Liz Smylie Laura Arraya
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1980 11–4 73.3% — 1,630 0 1 1981 19–8 70.4% — 1,685 0 4
18 1981 2–10 16.7% — 1,515 0 1 1982 33–17 66.0% — 1,741 0 7
19 1982 15–8 65.2% — 1,628 0 3 1983 23–23 50.0% — 1,712 0 7
20 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,754 0 4 1984 29–18 61.7% #34 1,759 0 8
21 1984 13–18 41.9% #36 1,765 0 4 1985 17–21 44.7% #63 1,691 0 8
22 1985 16–19 45.7% #43 1,729 0 4 1986 23–24 48.9% #33 1,718 0 8
23 1986 6–13 31.6% #114 1,668 0 4 1987 16–14 53.3% #45 1,770 0 8
24 1987 20–14 58.8% #27 1,747 0 5 — — — — — — —
25 1988 4–12 25.0% #153 1,607 0 5 1989 27–12 69.2% #19 1,882 0 10
26 1989 21–22 48.8% #66 1,681 0 5 1990 26–19 57.8% #21 1,821 0 10
27 1990 15–16 48.4% #53 1,665 0 5 1991 28–17 62.2% #24 1,823 0 10
28 1991 9–16 36.0% #116 1,612 0 5 1992 20–19 51.3% #45 1,732 0 10
29 1992 0–1 0.0% #209 1,599 0 5 1993 9–12 42.9% #71 1,682 0 10
30 1993 7–15 31.8% #125 1,549 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 1994 2–7 22.2% #192 1,515 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Liz Smylie Laura Arraya
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1980 — — — — — — — — 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1981 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1982 10 6 16 62.5% 23 10 33 69.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 1983 10 8 18 55.6% 10 11 21 47.6% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
20 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 1984 7 7 14 50.0% 19 7 26 73.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1985 9 9 18 50.0% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1985 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 9 7 16 56.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1986 3 7 10 30.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
23 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 7 5 12 58.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
24 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1988 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 15 3 18 83.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1989 14 14 28 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1990 13 6 19 68.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1990 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1991 18 12 30 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 1991 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1992 8 9 17 47.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0%
29 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 1993 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 80 131 38.9% 11 19 30 36.7% 84 60 144 58.3% 13 29 42 31.0% — 105 80 185 56.8% 103 73 176 58.5% 16 14 30 53.3% 28 31 59 47.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Liz Smylie Laura Arraya
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1980 1630 113.8 — — — — — — +68 63.6% +0.73 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) 103.1 +1.27 1981 1685 129.1 — — — — -70 — — 65.6% +0.74 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 104.4 -1.24
18 1981 1516 99.0 — — — — +29 +16 +113 20.0% -1.68 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.93 1982 1742 126.9 — — — — -61 -27 — 62.7% +0.91 10–8 (56%) 8–5 (62%) 102.3 +2.71
19 1982 1628 117.1 — — — — — +36 +61 59.3% +0.70 8–2 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 106.2 +1.87 1983 1713 125.7 — — — — +8 +30 — 51.4% -0.24 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 95.2 +0.84
20 1983 1754 135.8 — — — — -168 -34 +79 54.4% +0.25 8–5 (62%) 3–3 (50%) 104.5 +2.10 1984 1760 130.6 — — — — -102 +141 -132 53.8% +0.03 18–5 (78%) 9–4 (69%) 110.1 +0.94
21 1984 1765 122.9 — — — — -245 -129 +140 45.6% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.5 -1.24 1985 1692 124.9 — — — — -2 +60 — 45.1% -0.27 8–7 (53%) 3–2 (60%) 99.8 +1.84
22 1985 1730 128.1 — — — — -158 — +131 47.1% -0.38 7–8 (47%) 3–3 (50%) 99.5 -0.38 1986 1718 138.1 — — — — -26 +100 — 51.0% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 100.4 -1.79
23 1986 1669 119.0 — — — — -124 -109 +185 38.5% -0.67 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 96.1 -0.61 1987 1770 133.4 — — — — -31 -11 -184 51.6% +0.05 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) 100.0 -2.60
24 1987 1747 133.3 — — — — -128 — +164 57.7% +0.17 5–5 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.3 +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1988 1607 97.5 — — — — -90 — +200 25.7% -1.91 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 102.1 +1.27 1989 1883 136.8 — — — — -8 -146 -254 65.2% +0.79 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 102.9 +0.41
26 1989 1682 124.8 — — — — -34 -171 +107 47.1% -0.16 10–6 (63%) 5–7 (42%) 101.1 +1.75 1990 1821 141.9 — — — — +31 -55 -173 55.4% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 5–8 (38%) 98.6 +0.41
27 1990 1665 124.3 — — — — +4 — +123 47.1% -0.23 7–3 (70%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 +0.59 1991 1823 132.7 — — — — +13 -70 -95 56.9% +0.19 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 105.5 +2.96
28 1991 1613 115.0 — — — — -44 — +187 37.9% -1.31 4–4 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 103.0 -0.32 1992 1733 139.0 — — — — +2 +53 +3 49.4% +0.06 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 97.6 +1.62
29 1992 1600 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01 1993 1682 125.0 — — — — +13 +124 +9 44.0% -0.66 4–4 (50%) 2–0 — -0.06
30 1993 1550 117.2 — — — — -36 — +259 37.0% -0.70 4–6 (40%) 0–2 — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 1515 99.5 — — — — -31 — +232 31.6% -1.79 1–2 (33%) — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1824 127.3 — — — — -80 -43 +132 46.2% -0.37 67–54 (55%) 30–38 (44%) 100.0 +2.29 — 1923 138.4 — — — — -10 +27 -133 54.6% +0.19 90–63 (59%) 50–44 (53%) 104.5 +1.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.