H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 4–1 lead over Liz Smylie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 2–1 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Liz Smylie won the 1993 Japan Women's Open round of 32 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liz Smylie | 6-2 6-4 | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | Match data | Feb 12, 1993* | R32 | Japan Women's Open | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Carpet |
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 6-1 6-2 | Liz Smylie | Match data | Nov 14, 1991* | R32 | Philadelphia | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Carpet |
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 6-1 6-1 | Liz Smylie | Match data | Nov 9, 1990* | R16 | Worcester | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Carpet |
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 6-4 6-4 | Liz Smylie | Match data | May 31, 1989* | R128 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 7-6 6-1 | Liz Smylie | Match data | Jun 29, 1986* | R32 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liz Smylie | — | #20 | 29 | 1,824 | 161 | 189 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | — | #3 | 148 | 2,131 | 464 | 185 | 71.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 19 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Liz Smylie | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 21–16 | 56.8% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1980 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 50–16 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,100 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1981 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,075 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 1982 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,992 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 1983 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,114 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #36 | 1,765 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,102 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1985 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #9 | 2,019 | 0 | 12 |
| 23 | 1986 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #114 | 1,669 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #9 | 2,068 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1987 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #27 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #10 | 2,028 | 0 | 15 |
| 25 | 1988 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #153 | 1,607 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #9 | 1,998 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 1989 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,046 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #53 | 1,665 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 12–2 | 85.7% | — | 2,067 | 0 | 19 |
| 28 | 1991 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,599 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1993 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #125 | 1,549 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #192 | 1,515 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Liz Smylie | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 17 | 1980 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 27 | 5 | 32 | 84.4% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% |
| 18 | 1981 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 13 | 5 | 18 | 72.2% |
| 19 | 1982 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 13 | 5 | 18 | 72.2% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% |
| 20 | 1983 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1987 | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 19 | 5 | 24 | 79.2% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% |
| 21 | 1984 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1988 | 23 | 5 | 28 | 82.1% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 13 | 5 | 18 | 72.2% |
| 22 | 1985 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | — | — | — | — | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1989 | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | — | — | — | — | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% |
| 23 | 1986 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1990 | 19 | 6 | 25 | 76.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% |
| 24 | 1987 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1991 | 16 | 7 | 23 | 69.6% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | — | — | — | — | 17 | 4 | 21 | 81.0% |
| 25 | 1988 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1992 | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% |
| 26 | 1989 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1993 | 16 | 5 | 21 | 76.2% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% |
| 27 | 1990 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1994 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% |
| 28 | 1991 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1992 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1993 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 11.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1994 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 51 | 80 | 131 | 38.9% | 11 | 19 | 30 | 36.7% | 84 | 60 | 144 | 58.3% | 13 | 29 | 42 | 31.0% | — | 145 | 53 | 198 | 73.2% | 156 | 62 | 218 | 71.6% | 38 | 20 | 58 | 65.5% | 125 | 50 | 175 | 71.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Liz Smylie | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1688 | 121.9 | — | — | — | — | -90 | -61 | -1 | 55.2% | +0.14 | 6–2 (75%) | 3–3 (50%) | 105.4 | +1.43 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1789 | 136.5 | — | — | — | — | -119 | 0 | -127 | 57.1% | +0.45 | 4–6 (40%) | 2–1 (67%) | 99.8 | -0.63 |
| 17 | 1980 | 1631 | 113.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +66 | 63.6% | +0.73 | 4–1 (80%) | 2–2 (50%) | 103.1 | +1.28 | 1984 | 2101 | 169.3 | — | — | — | — | -162 | +36 | -328 | 70.4% | +1.55 | 13–7 (65%) | 6–2 (75%) | 112.6 | -2.55 |
| 18 | 1981 | 1516 | 99.1 | — | — | — | — | +29 | +16 | +113 | 20.0% | -1.68 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–1 | — | +0.89 | 1985 | 2076 | 161.5 | — | — | — | — | -48 | +9 | -203 | 70.6% | +1.90 | 6–4 (60%) | 5–4 (56%) | 99.5 | -0.41 |
| 19 | 1982 | 1629 | 117.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +36 | +60 | 59.3% | +0.70 | 8–2 (80%) | 3–4 (43%) | 106.2 | +1.74 | 1986 | 1993 | 161.5 | — | — | — | — | -5 | +31 | -52 | 65.7% | +1.31 | 7–12 (37%) | 5–6 (45%) | 90.3 | -2.26 |
| 20 | 1983 | 1755 | 135.9 | — | — | — | — | -170 | -34 | +77 | 54.4% | +0.25 | 8–5 (62%) | 3–3 (50%) | 104.5 | +2.04 | 1987 | 2114 | 165.7 | — | — | — | — | -24 | -9 | -172 | 68.6% | +1.51 | 14–8 (64%) | 4–5 (44%) | 101.3 | -4.28 |
| 21 | 1984 | 1766 | 123.0 | — | — | — | — | -246 | -130 | +139 | 45.6% | -0.50 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–2 (50%) | 98.6 | -1.30 | 1988 | 2102 | 162.5 | — | — | — | — | +47 | -48 | — | 73.1% | +1.85 | 5–7 (42%) | 6–4 (60%) | 96.3 | -1.56 |
| 22 | 1985 | 1730 | 128.2 | — | — | — | — | -158 | — | +131 | 47.1% | -0.38 | 7–8 (47%) | 3–3 (50%) | 99.5 | -0.26 | 1989 | 2019 | 154.6 | — | — | — | — | +29 | +17 | — | 69.0% | +1.48 | 5–3 (63%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.1 | +1.23 |
| 23 | 1986 | 1669 | 119.1 | — | — | — | — | -123 | -108 | +185 | 38.5% | -0.67 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–5 (38%) | 96.1 | -0.67 | 1990 | 2069 | 173.2 | — | — | — | — | +56 | -42 | — | 68.5% | +1.77 | 9–7 (56%) | 3–1 (75%) | 103.3 | -2.84 |
| 24 | 1987 | 1748 | 133.3 | — | — | — | — | -128 | — | +163 | 57.7% | +0.17 | 5–5 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | 102.3 | +0.17 | 1991 | 2028 | 159.2 | — | — | — | — | +51 | +26 | — | 72.7% | +1.77 | 7–4 (64%) | 5–5 (50%) | 99.7 | +1.33 |
| 25 | 1988 | 1607 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | -89 | — | +199 | 25.7% | -1.91 | 4–1 (80%) | 1–2 (33%) | 102.1 | +1.24 | 1992 | 1999 | 152.0 | — | — | — | — | +87 | +17 | -91 | 67.0% | +1.41 | 10–3 (77%) | 2–4 (33%) | 101.2 | +2.30 |
| 26 | 1989 | 1682 | 124.9 | — | — | — | — | -33 | -171 | +107 | 47.1% | -0.16 | 10–6 (63%) | 5–7 (42%) | 101.1 | +1.69 | 1993 | 2046 | 159.7 | — | — | — | — | +80 | -115 | — | 65.8% | +1.04 | 8–7 (53%) | 4–2 (67%) | 99.2 | -0.01 |
| 27 | 1990 | 1666 | 124.4 | — | — | — | — | +4 | — | +122 | 47.1% | -0.23 | 7–3 (70%) | 2–5 (29%) | 101.1 | +0.59 | 1994 | 2068 | 143.1 | — | — | — | — | +47 | — | — | 77.4% | +2.36 | 3–0 (100%) | 0–2 | — | +0.52 |
| 28 | 1991 | 1613 | 115.0 | — | — | — | — | -43 | — | +187 | 37.9% | -1.31 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–1 (80%) | 103.0 | -0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1992 | 1600 | 99.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1993 | 1550 | 117.2 | — | — | — | — | -36 | — | +259 | 37.0% | -0.70 | 4–6 (40%) | 0–2 | — | +0.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1994 | 1515 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | -31 | — | +232 | 31.6% | -1.79 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1824 | 127.4 | — | — | — | — | -80 | -43 | +132 | 46.2% | -0.37 | 67–54 (55%) | 30–38 (44%) | 100.0 | +2.21 | — | 2131 | 166.2 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -4 | -134 | 68.1% | +1.46 | 97–70 (58%) | 48–41 (54%) | 101.4 | -1.19 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hana Mandlikova | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jan 11, 1990 | H2H |
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 2 | 5 | 7 | Jan 16, 1991 | H2H |
| Gretchen Magers | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jun 20, 1991 | H2H |
| Elna Reinach | 1 | 4 | 5 | Feb 18, 1993 | H2H |
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 1 | 4 | 5 | Feb 12, 1993 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Evert | 2 | 16 | 18 | Nov 12, 1988 | H2H |
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 17 | 17 | Sep 11, 1993 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 3 | 11 | 14 | Feb 5, 1994 | H2H |
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | 12 | 1 | 13 | Aug 2, 1992 | H2H |
| Nathalie Tauziat | 4 | 6 | 10 | Feb 6, 1993 | H2H |