H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Liz Smylie vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 0-2

Mareen Louie Harper holds a 2–0 lead over Liz Smylie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mareen Louie Harper leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mareen Louie Harper won the 1988 Tokyo Pan Pacific round of 32 7-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Liz Smylie
AUS Age 63 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Mareen Louie Harper
USA Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mareen Louie Harper 7-6 6-2 Liz Smylie #67 Match data Apr 28, 1988* R32 Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 Carpet
Mareen Louie Harper 6-2 4-6 6-2 Liz Smylie #68 Match data Jan 27, 1984* R16 Pittsburgh WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Liz Smylie #501 #20 29 1,823 161 189 46.0% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Mareen Louie Harper — — — 1,910 177 239 42.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Liz Smylie Mareen Louie Harper
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1974 2–1 66.7% — 1,523 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,521 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,519 0 0
17 1980 11–4 73.3% — 1,630 0 1 1978 7–12 36.8% — 1,588 0 0
18 1981 2–10 16.7% — 1,515 0 1 1979 4–13 23.5% — 1,568 0 0
19 1982 15–8 65.2% — 1,628 0 3 1980 22–23 48.9% — 1,714 0 0
20 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,754 0 4 1981 16–20 44.4% — 1,743 0 0
21 1984 13–18 41.9% #36 1,765 0 4 1982 9–18 33.3% — 1,654 0 0
22 1985 16–19 45.7% #43 1,729 0 4 1983 7–10 41.2% — 1,671 0 0
23 1986 6–13 31.6% #114 1,668 0 4 1984 18–17 51.4% — 1,733 0 1
24 1987 20–14 58.8% #27 1,747 0 5 1985 29–18 61.7% — 1,776 0 2
25 1988 4–12 25.0% #153 1,607 0 5 1986 12–17 41.4% — 1,679 0 2
26 1989 21–22 48.8% #66 1,681 0 5 1987 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 2
27 1990 15–16 48.4% #53 1,665 0 5 1988 12–17 41.4% — 1,613 0 2
28 1991 9–16 36.0% #116 1,612 0 5 1989 6–14 30.0% — 1,576 0 2
29 1992 0–1 0.0% #209 1,599 0 5 1990 10–15 40.0% — 1,590 0 2
30 1993 7–15 31.8% #125 1,549 0 5 1991 12–16 42.9% — 1,614 0 2
31 1994 2–7 22.2% #192 1,515 0 5 1992 1–7 12.5% — 1,545 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,536 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Liz Smylie Mareen Louie Harper
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1980 — — — — — — — — 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
18 1981 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 11 18 38.9%
20 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 1981 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4%
21 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1982 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
22 1985 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 9 7 16 56.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
23 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1984 14 9 23 60.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
25 1988 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3%
26 1989 14 14 28 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1990 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1988 8 11 19 42.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1991 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1989 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 1993 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1991 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 1994 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 80 131 38.9% 11 19 30 36.7% 84 60 144 58.3% 13 29 42 31.0% — 104 118 222 46.8% 10 16 26 38.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 47 78 125 37.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Liz Smylie Mareen Louie Harper
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1524 102.4 — — — — +72 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 1–0 — +0.56
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1522 100.6 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.36
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1520 116.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.35
17 1980 1630 113.8 — — — — — — +68 63.6% +0.73 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) 103.1 +1.27 1978 1589 122.4 — — — — +31 -31 — 34.1% -1.25 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) 108.1 -0.33
18 1981 1516 99.0 — — — — +29 +16 +113 20.0% -1.68 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.93 1979 1568 121.3 — — — — +25 — — 30.0% -1.90 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.42
19 1982 1628 117.1 — — — — — +36 +61 59.3% +0.70 8–2 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 106.2 +1.87 1980 1714 128.5 — — — — -41 -153 -36 46.2% -0.59 12–4 (75%) 2–6 (25%) 107.6 +1.57
20 1983 1754 135.8 — — — — -168 -34 +79 54.4% +0.25 8–5 (62%) 3–3 (50%) 104.5 +2.10 1981 1743 134.3 — — — — -2 — -72 42.7% -0.51 7–5 (58%) 4–2 (67%) 105.0 -1.63
21 1984 1765 122.9 — — — — -245 -129 +140 45.6% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.5 -1.24 1982 1655 124.8 — — — — -27 -46 — 35.5% -1.06 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -1.27
22 1985 1730 128.1 — — — — -158 — +131 47.1% -0.38 7–8 (47%) 3–3 (50%) 99.5 -0.38 1983 1671 132.0 — — — — -14 — — 42.9% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.4 -0.99
23 1986 1669 119.0 — — — — -124 -109 +185 38.5% -0.67 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 96.1 -0.61 1984 1733 127.5 — — — — +24 — -94 48.8% -0.05 7–3 (70%) 2–3 (40%) 105.0 +0.67
24 1987 1747 133.3 — — — — -128 — +164 57.7% +0.17 5–5 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.3 +0.13 1985 1777 143.7 — — — — +52 — -157 58.5% +0.41 8–4 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 101.8 -0.01
25 1988 1607 97.5 — — — — -90 — +200 25.7% -1.91 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 102.1 +1.27 1986 1680 121.2 — — — — +20 — -65 39.1% -0.55 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 97.5 +1.39
26 1989 1682 124.8 — — — — -34 -171 +107 47.1% -0.16 10–6 (63%) 5–7 (42%) 101.1 +1.75 1987 1624 119.5 — — — — +6 — -17 38.6% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +0.33
27 1990 1665 124.3 — — — — +4 — +123 47.1% -0.23 7–3 (70%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 +0.59 1988 1614 129.1 — — — — +11 — — 43.3% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 100.4 -0.29
28 1991 1613 115.0 — — — — -44 — +187 37.9% -1.31 4–4 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 103.0 -0.32 1989 1576 117.3 — — — — -17 — -21 32.0% -1.38 6–4 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 107.4 -1.33
29 1992 1600 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01 1990 1590 128.4 — — — — +10 — — 45.8% -0.14 2–7 (22%) 1–3 (25%) 94.5 +0.31
30 1993 1550 117.2 — — — — -36 — +259 37.0% -0.70 4–6 (40%) 0–2 — +0.46 1991 1615 127.2 — — — — -4 — -50 39.4% -0.53 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.2 +0.46
31 1994 1515 99.5 — — — — -31 — +232 31.6% -1.79 1–2 (33%) — — +0.11 1992 1545 105.4 — — — — -7 — — 25.0% -1.81 0–2 1–0 — -0.11
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1537 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
Career — 1824 127.3 — — — — -80 -43 +132 46.2% -0.37 67–54 (55%) 30–38 (44%) 100.0 +2.29 — 1911 135.2 — — — — +7 -78 -59 42.4% -0.57 76–56 (58%) 40–42 (49%) 107.5 -0.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.