H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Liz Smylie vs Mary Lou Piatek H2H: 1-0
Liz Smylie holds a 1–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Liz Smylie leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Liz Smylie won the 1987 Oklahoma fourth round 2-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 1987* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Liz Smylie | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liz Smylie | #501 | #20 | 29 | 1,824 | 161 | 188 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Liz Smylie | Mary Lou Piatek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #36 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #114 | 1,669 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| 1987 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #27 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 1989 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 |
| 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 1991 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 |
| 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,599 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 1993 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #125 | 1,550 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #192 | 1,515 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 |