H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Liz Smylie vs Pascale Paradis Mangon H2H: 3-1

Liz Smylie holds a 3–1 lead over Pascale Paradis Mangon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Liz Smylie leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pascale Paradis Mangon won the 1992 Canadian Open round of 64 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Liz Smylie
AUS Age 63 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Pascale Paradis Mangon
FRA Age 60 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pascale Paradis Mangon 6-2 6-2 Liz Smylie #513 Match data Aug 19, 1992* R64 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Liz Smylie #42 6-3 6-4 Pascale Paradis Mangon Match data Aug 8, 1985* R32 Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Liz Smylie #40 6-2 6-4 Pascale Paradis Mangon Match data Jan 10, 1985* R32 Washington Open WTA 500 Carpet
Liz Smylie #65 5-7 6-4 7-5 Pascale Paradis Mangon Match data Nov 17, 1984* SF Brisbane International WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Liz Smylie — #20 29 1,824 161 189 46.0% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Pascale Paradis Mangon — — — 1,817 139 157 47.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Liz Smylie Pascale Paradis Mangon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 0
17 1980 11–4 73.3% — 1,630 0 1 1983 8–6 57.1% — 1,597 0 1
18 1981 2–10 16.7% — 1,515 0 1 1984 25–21 54.3% — 1,795 0 1
19 1982 15–8 65.2% — 1,628 0 3 1985 18–20 47.4% — 1,732 0 1
20 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,754 0 4 1986 5–16 23.8% — 1,591 0 1
21 1984 13–18 41.9% #36 1,765 0 4 1987 7–14 33.3% — 1,573 0 1
22 1985 16–19 45.7% #43 1,730 0 4 1988 19–12 61.3% — 1,758 0 1
23 1986 6–13 31.6% #114 1,669 0 4 1989 4–10 28.6% — 1,678 0 1
24 1987 20–14 58.8% #27 1,748 0 5 1990 3–9 25.0% — 1,591 0 1
25 1988 4–12 25.0% #153 1,607 0 5 1991 13–14 48.1% — 1,629 0 1
26 1989 21–22 48.8% #66 1,682 0 5 1992 21–17 55.3% — 1,728 0 1
27 1990 15–16 48.4% #53 1,665 0 5 1993 16–16 50.0% — 1,675 0 1
28 1991 9–16 36.0% #116 1,612 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1992 0–1 0.0% #209 1,599 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1993 7–15 31.8% #125 1,549 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 1994 2–7 22.2% #192 1,515 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Liz Smylie Pascale Paradis Mangon
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1980 — — — — — — — — 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 1983 3 1 4 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1981 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1984 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
19 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 3 5 40.0%
20 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 1986 4 4 8 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3%
21 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1987 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1985 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 9 7 16 56.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1988 8 4 12 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — —
23 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1988 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
26 1989 14 14 28 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1992 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6%
27 1990 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1993 4 7 11 36.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
28 1991 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 80 131 38.9% 11 19 30 36.7% 84 60 144 58.3% 13 29 42 31.0% — 52 62 114 45.6% 13 28 41 31.7% 34 30 64 53.1% 40 37 77 51.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Liz Smylie Pascale Paradis Mangon
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1484 97.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.14
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1477 102.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.05
17 1980 1631 113.8 — — — — — — +66 63.6% +0.73 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) 103.1 +1.28 1983 1598 124.9 — — — — +33 +6 +15 54.5% +0.45 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +1.02
18 1981 1516 99.1 — — — — +29 +16 +113 20.0% -1.68 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.89 1984 1795 140.0 — — — — -60 -200 -20 51.4% +0.27 11–8 (58%) 5–8 (38%) 103.9 +0.91
19 1982 1629 117.0 — — — — — +36 +60 59.3% +0.70 8–2 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 106.2 +1.74 1985 1732 132.1 — — — — -47 -134 +46 46.3% -0.15 11–8 (58%) 7–9 (44%) 101.1 -1.07
20 1983 1755 135.9 — — — — -170 -34 +77 54.4% +0.25 8–5 (62%) 3–3 (50%) 104.5 +2.04 1986 1592 109.3 — — — — +12 -70 — 35.2% -0.81 3–9 (25%) 2–5 (29%) 89.6 +0.67
21 1984 1766 123.0 — — — — -246 -130 +139 45.6% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.6 -1.30 1987 1573 113.2 — — — — +27 — — 37.0% -1.02 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 95.5 +0.44
22 1985 1730 128.2 — — — — -158 — +131 47.1% -0.38 7–8 (47%) 3–3 (50%) 99.5 -0.26 1988 1759 137.4 — — — — -51 -335 +77 58.9% +0.55 6–5 (55%) 0–1 — +0.74
23 1986 1669 119.1 — — — — -123 -108 +185 38.5% -0.67 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 96.1 -0.67 1989 1679 123.2 — — — — -19 — — 33.3% -0.97 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.95
24 1987 1748 133.3 — — — — -128 — +163 57.7% +0.17 5–5 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.3 +0.17 1990 1591 108.4 — — — — +9 — — 32.3% -1.03 3–4 (43%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 +0.11
25 1988 1607 97.6 — — — — -89 — +199 25.7% -1.91 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 102.1 +1.24 1991 1630 128.1 — — — — +14 — +137 50.8% +0.27 3–4 (43%) 0–1 — +0.74
26 1989 1682 124.9 — — — — -33 -171 +107 47.1% -0.16 10–6 (63%) 5–7 (42%) 101.1 +1.69 1992 1729 133.9 — — — — +17 -308 +21 54.5% +0.28 6–6 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.3 +1.14
27 1990 1666 124.4 — — — — +4 — +122 47.1% -0.23 7–3 (70%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 +0.59 1993 1675 130.6 — — — — -11 -173 +95 50.7% +0.32 5–6 (45%) 2–1 (67%) 99.4 +0.13
28 1991 1613 115.0 — — — — -43 — +187 37.9% -1.31 4–4 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 103.0 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 1600 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 1550 117.2 — — — — -36 — +259 37.0% -0.70 4–6 (40%) 0–2 — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 1515 99.5 — — — — -31 — +232 31.6% -1.79 1–2 (33%) — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1824 127.4 — — — — -80 -43 +132 46.2% -0.37 67–54 (55%) 30–38 (44%) 100.0 +2.21 — 1818 135.5 — — — — -9 -167 +48 47.9% -0.04 54–60 (47%) 22–35 (39%) 92.9 +1.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.