H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Liz Smylie vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 1-1

Liz Smylie and Patricia Hy Boulais are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Liz Smylie leads 1–0 on grass, while Patricia Hy Boulais leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patricia Hy Boulais won the 1991 Tokyo Nichirei round of 32 6-0 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Liz Smylie
AUS Age 63 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Patricia Hy Boulais
CAN Age 61 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patricia Hy Boulais 6-0 7-5 Liz Smylie #86 Match data Sep 19, 1991* R32 Tokyo Nichirei Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Liz Smylie #77 6-2 6-3 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data Jan 16, 1987* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Liz Smylie #501 #20 29 1,823 161 189 46.0% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Patricia Hy Boulais — — — 1,906 142 165 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Liz Smylie Patricia Hy Boulais
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1980 11–4 73.3% — 1,630 0 1 1983 7–8 46.7% — 1,546 0 0
18 1981 2–10 16.7% — 1,515 0 1 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 0
19 1982 15–8 65.2% — 1,628 0 3 — — — — — — —
20 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,754 0 4 1986 8–1 88.9% — 1,633 0 1
21 1984 13–18 41.9% #36 1,765 0 4 1987 9–15 37.5% — 1,594 0 1
22 1985 16–19 45.7% #43 1,729 0 4 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,548 0 1
23 1986 6–13 31.6% #114 1,668 0 4 1989 1–4 20.0% — 1,514 0 1
24 1987 20–14 58.8% #27 1,747 0 5 1990 7–7 50.0% — 1,573 0 1
25 1988 4–12 25.0% #153 1,607 0 5 1991 18–17 51.4% — 1,704 0 1
26 1989 21–22 48.8% #66 1,681 0 5 1992 22–16 57.9% — 1,876 0 1
27 1990 15–16 48.4% #53 1,665 0 5 1993 21–15 58.3% — 1,851 0 1
28 1991 9–16 36.0% #116 1,612 0 5 1994 15–16 48.4% — 1,756 0 1
29 1992 0–1 0.0% #209 1,599 0 5 1995 11–14 44.0% — 1,691 0 1
30 1993 7–15 31.8% #125 1,549 0 5 1996 10–16 38.5% — 1,687 0 1
31 1994 2–7 22.2% #192 1,515 0 5 1997 12–19 38.7% — 1,663 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1998 1–8 11.1% — 1,573 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Liz Smylie Patricia Hy Boulais
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1980 — — — — — — — — 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 1983 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1981 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 1986 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 5 0 5 100.0%
21 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1985 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 9 7 16 56.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1988 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 1988 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1989 14 14 28 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1992 8 5 13 61.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 1990 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 1991 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1994 11 9 20 55.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 5 8 13 38.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1993 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1996 1 7 8 12.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 1994 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 51 80 131 38.9% 11 19 30 36.7% 84 60 144 58.3% 13 29 42 31.0% — 72 85 157 45.9% 28 39 67 41.8% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Liz Smylie Patricia Hy Boulais
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1493 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1477 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.18
17 1980 1630 113.8 — — — — — — +68 63.6% +0.73 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) 103.1 +1.27 1983 1546 117.5 — — — — +51 — +83 46.9% +0.12 1–1 1–1 — +0.93
18 1981 1516 99.0 — — — — +29 +16 +113 20.0% -1.68 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.93 1984 1523 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–1 — +0.06
19 1982 1628 117.1 — — — — — +36 +61 59.3% +0.70 8–2 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 106.2 +1.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1983 1754 135.8 — — — — -168 -34 +79 54.4% +0.25 8–5 (62%) 3–3 (50%) 104.5 +2.10 1986 1633 110.5 — — — — +41 — — 69.6% +1.65 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) — +2.61
21 1984 1765 122.9 — — — — -245 -129 +140 45.6% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.5 -1.24 1987 1595 115.4 — — — — +48 — +10 37.5% -0.93 5–3 (63%) 1–6 (14%) 97.9 -0.17
22 1985 1730 128.1 — — — — -158 — +131 47.1% -0.38 7–8 (47%) 3–3 (50%) 99.5 -0.38 1988 1548 99.0 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–2 — -0.27
23 1986 1669 119.0 — — — — -124 -109 +185 38.5% -0.67 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 96.1 -0.61 1989 1515 91.9 — — — — +9 — — 20.0% -2.30 — — — +0.31
24 1987 1747 133.3 — — — — -128 — +164 57.7% +0.17 5–5 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.3 +0.13 1990 1574 118.5 — — — — +7 — — 51.7% +0.41 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.67
25 1988 1607 97.5 — — — — -90 — +200 25.7% -1.91 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 102.1 +1.27 1991 1704 141.1 — — — — -20 -265 +2 50.0% +0.11 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.8 -0.45
26 1989 1682 124.8 — — — — -34 -171 +107 47.1% -0.16 10–6 (63%) 5–7 (42%) 101.1 +1.75 1992 1877 155.6 — — — — -71 -231 -109 56.3% +0.35 7–3 (70%) 2–2 (50%) 107.4 -1.82
27 1990 1665 124.3 — — — — +4 — +123 47.1% -0.23 7–3 (70%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 +0.59 1993 1852 141.8 — — — — -46 -170 +3 57.0% +0.38 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.0 -1.32
28 1991 1613 115.0 — — — — -44 — +187 37.9% -1.31 4–4 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 103.0 -0.32 1994 1756 132.7 — — — — +24 -99 — 52.4% +0.25 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 -0.60
29 1992 1600 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01 1995 1691 125.6 — — — — +15 -27 — 50.0% -0.18 3–9 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 93.7 +0.06
30 1993 1550 117.2 — — — — -36 — +259 37.0% -0.70 4–6 (40%) 0–2 — +0.46 1996 1687 132.9 — — — — -41 -41 +161 40.0% -0.73 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -1.41
31 1994 1515 99.5 — — — — -31 — +232 31.6% -1.79 1–2 (33%) — — +0.11 1997 1664 129.6 — — — — -71 +1 +194 40.3% -0.58 8–7 (53%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 -0.88
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1574 92.9 — — — — -25 -9 — 26.1% -2.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.04
Career — 1824 127.3 — — — — -80 -43 +132 46.2% -0.37 67–54 (55%) 30–38 (44%) 100.0 +2.29 — 1906 138.1 — — — — -10 -116 +43 47.1% -0.18 50–44 (53%) 22–33 (40%) 98.3 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.