H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Liz Smylie vs Raffaella Reggi Concato H2H: 0-2
Raffaella Reggi Concato holds a 2–0 lead over Liz Smylie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1989 Oklahoma third round 5-7 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 1989* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 5-7 6-2 6-4 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1986* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 7-5 7-6 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liz Smylie | #501 | #20 | 29 | 1,824 | 161 | 188 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Liz Smylie | Raffaella Reggi Concato | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1980 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1983 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #36 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1985 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1986 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #114 | 1,669 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1987 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #27 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1989 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1991 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,599 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1993 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #125 | 1,550 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #192 | 1,515 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |