H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Liz Smylie vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 1-0

Liz Smylie holds a 1–0 lead over Sandra Cecchini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Liz Smylie leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Liz Smylie won the 1991 Wimbledon round of 128 6-3 3-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Liz Smylie
AUS Age 63 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Liz Smylie #89 6-3 3-6 6-1 Sandra Cecchini #19 Match data Jun 26, 1991* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Liz Smylie #501 #20 29 1,823 161 189 46.0% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,936 300 217 58.0% 0 0 0 2 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Liz Smylie Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1980 11–4 73.3% — 1,630 0 1 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,484 0 0
18 1981 2–10 16.7% — 1,515 0 1 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 0
19 1982 15–8 65.2% — 1,628 0 3 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,754 0 4 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1984 13–18 41.9% #36 1,765 0 4 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,633 0 3
22 1985 16–19 45.7% #43 1,729 0 4 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,859 0 5
23 1986 6–13 31.6% #114 1,668 0 4 1988 34–15 69.4% #21 1,843 0 7
24 1987 20–14 58.8% #27 1,747 0 5 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1988 4–12 25.0% #153 1,607 0 5 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,814 0 9
26 1989 21–22 48.8% #66 1,681 0 5 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,773 0 10
27 1990 15–16 48.4% #53 1,665 0 5 1992 24–16 60.0% #34 1,823 0 11
28 1991 9–16 36.0% #116 1,612 0 5 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,726 0 11
29 1992 0–1 0.0% #209 1,599 0 5 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 1993 7–15 31.8% #125 1,549 0 5 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 1994 2–7 22.2% #192 1,515 0 5 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,628 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,608 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,555 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Liz Smylie Sandra Cecchini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1980 — — — — — — — — 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1981 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 1984 12 4 16 75.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 1985 6 7 13 46.2% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 1985 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 9 7 16 56.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1987 8 4 12 66.7% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 29 8 37 78.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1988 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1989 14 14 28 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 21 9 30 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1990 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1991 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
30 1993 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 1994 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 80 131 38.9% 11 19 30 36.7% 84 60 144 58.3% 13 29 42 31.0% — 40 42 82 48.8% 236 140 376 62.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 21 26 47 44.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Liz Smylie Sandra Cecchini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1478 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
17 1980 1630 113.8 — — — — — — +68 63.6% +0.73 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) 103.1 +1.27 1982 1484 101.9 — — — — — +37 — 44.4% +0.11 1–0 — — +0.65
18 1981 1516 99.0 — — — — +29 +16 +113 20.0% -1.68 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.93 1983 1497 106.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.17
19 1982 1628 117.1 — — — — — +36 +61 59.3% +0.70 8–2 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 106.2 +1.87 1984 1651 123.3 — — — — +49 -79 -56 53.9% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.6 +2.06
20 1983 1754 135.8 — — — — -168 -34 +79 54.4% +0.25 8–5 (62%) 3–3 (50%) 104.5 +2.10 1985 1747 132.3 — — — — -80 +43 — 51.1% -0.19 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 109.7 +0.71
21 1984 1765 122.9 — — — — -245 -129 +140 45.6% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.5 -1.24 1986 1633 120.0 — — — — -65 +149 — 43.2% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 96.0 +0.42
22 1985 1730 128.1 — — — — -158 — +131 47.1% -0.38 7–8 (47%) 3–3 (50%) 99.5 -0.38 1987 1859 148.1 — — — — -141 +79 — 66.7% +1.10 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.44
23 1986 1669 119.0 — — — — -124 -109 +185 38.5% -0.67 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 96.1 -0.61 1988 1843 145.8 — — — — -149 +157 — 64.2% +1.10 9–2 (82%) 5–2 (71%) 107.7 +2.46
24 1987 1747 133.3 — — — — -128 — +164 57.7% +0.17 5–5 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.3 +0.13 1989 1799 128.9 — — — — -134 +134 — 59.4% +0.59 13–7 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 99.8 +3.27
25 1988 1607 97.5 — — — — -90 — +200 25.7% -1.91 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 102.1 +1.27 1990 1815 140.5 — — — — -136 +130 — 60.0% +0.83 10–5 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 +0.82
26 1989 1682 124.8 — — — — -34 -171 +107 47.1% -0.16 10–6 (63%) 5–7 (42%) 101.1 +1.75 1991 1774 131.6 — — — — -138 +151 — 61.3% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 100.3 +1.96
27 1990 1665 124.3 — — — — +4 — +123 47.1% -0.23 7–3 (70%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 +0.59 1992 1824 136.5 — — — — -222 +141 — 55.6% +0.29 8–2 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +0.11
28 1991 1613 115.0 — — — — -44 — +187 37.9% -1.31 4–4 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 103.0 -0.32 1993 1727 129.9 — — — — -151 +131 — 53.9% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 101.3 -0.35
29 1992 1600 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01 1994 1841 138.9 — — — — -123 +6 — 57.0% +0.51 14–5 (74%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 +0.57
30 1993 1550 117.2 — — — — -36 — +259 37.0% -0.70 4–6 (40%) 0–2 — +0.46 1995 1661 113.4 — — — — +36 +34 — 40.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 +0.31
31 1994 1515 99.5 — — — — -31 — +232 31.6% -1.79 1–2 (33%) — — +0.11 1996 1629 109.5 — — — — +14 +62 — 52.4% +0.05 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +1.57
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1608 106.4 — — — — — +32 — 39.1% -1.30 0–1 2–0 — -0.39
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1555 95.4 — — — — — +15 — 34.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.33
Career — 1824 127.3 — — — — -80 -43 +132 46.2% -0.37 67–54 (55%) 30–38 (44%) 100.0 +2.29 — 1936 137.9 — — — — -93 +97 -56 55.5% +0.35 98–62 (61%) 42–34 (55%) 106.0 +2.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.