H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Liz Smylie vs Terry Holladay H2H: 0-2
Terry Holladay holds a 2–0 lead over Liz Smylie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Terry Holladay leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Terry Holladay won the 1985 Birmingham second round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 70
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 1985* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Terry Holladay | 6-1 6-3 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
| Jan 30, 1985* | Marco Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Terry Holladay | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liz Smylie | #501 | #20 | 29 | 1,824 | 161 | 188 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Terry Holladay | #395 | #39 | 7 | 1,935 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Liz Smylie | Terry Holladay | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1980 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,876 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #36 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,932 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1985 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1986 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #114 | 1,669 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1987 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #27 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1989 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1991 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #50 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,599 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1993 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #125 | 1,550 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #103 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #192 | 1,515 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,500 | 0 | 1 |