H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Liz Smylie vs Terry Holladay H2H: 0-2

Terry Holladay holds a 2–0 lead over Liz Smylie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Terry Holladay leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Terry Holladay won the 1985 Birmingham round of 64 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Liz Smylie
AUS Age 63 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Terry Holladay
USA Age 70 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Terry Holladay 6-1 6-3 Liz Smylie #49 Match data Jun 12, 1985* R64 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Terry Holladay 6-4 2-6 6-4 Liz Smylie #40 Match data Jan 30, 1985* R64 Marco Island WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Liz Smylie — #20 29 1,824 161 189 46.0% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Terry Holladay — #39 7 1,945 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Liz Smylie Terry Holladay
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1972 2–3 40.0% — 1,473 0 0
17 1980 11–4 73.3% — 1,630 0 1 1973 4–2 66.7% — 1,507 0 0
18 1981 2–10 16.7% — 1,515 0 1 1974 12–17 41.4% — 1,563 0 0
19 1982 15–8 65.2% — 1,628 0 3 1975 32–23 58.2% — 1,758 0 0
20 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,754 0 4 1976 28–20 58.3% — 1,896 0 1
21 1984 13–18 41.9% #36 1,765 0 4 1977 15–15 50.0% — 1,943 0 1
22 1985 16–19 45.7% #43 1,730 0 4 1978 2–8 20.0% — 1,867 0 1
23 1986 6–13 31.6% #114 1,669 0 4 1979 17–18 48.6% — 1,832 0 1
24 1987 20–14 58.8% #27 1,748 0 5 1980 25–21 54.3% — 1,826 0 1
25 1988 4–12 25.0% #153 1,607 0 5 1981 4–12 25.0% — 1,673 0 1
26 1989 21–22 48.8% #66 1,682 0 5 1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,639 0 1
27 1990 15–16 48.4% #53 1,665 0 5 1983 9–8 52.9% — 1,679 0 1
28 1991 9–16 36.0% #116 1,612 0 5 1984 15–16 48.4% #50 1,677 0 1
29 1992 0–1 0.0% #209 1,599 0 5 1985 9–16 36.0% — 1,609 0 1
30 1993 7–15 31.8% #125 1,549 0 5 1986 5–8 38.5% #103 1,628 0 1
31 1994 2–7 22.2% #192 1,515 0 5 1987 0–9 0.0% #315 1,512 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Liz Smylie Terry Holladay
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1980 — — — — — — — — 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 1973 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1974 1 3 4 25.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
19 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 9 7 16 56.3%
20 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 1976 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 14 9 23 60.9%
21 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1977 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4%
22 1985 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 9 7 16 56.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1978 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1979 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 9 14 35.7%
24 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 12 23 47.8%
25 1988 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 1989 14 14 28 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1990 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1991 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1984 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 1993 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 1994 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 51 80 131 38.9% 11 19 30 36.7% 84 60 144 58.3% 13 29 42 31.0% — 64 69 133 48.1% 23 27 50 46.0% 42 39 81 51.9% 50 64 114 43.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Liz Smylie Terry Holladay
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1489 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.08
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1473 99.7 — — — — +72 — — 45.5% -0.27 0–1 0–1 — +1.13
17 1980 1631 113.8 — — — — — — +66 63.6% +0.73 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) 103.1 +1.28 1973 1507 105.7 — — — — +97 — — 66.7% +1.08 — 1–0 — +1.72
18 1981 1516 99.1 — — — — +29 +16 +113 20.0% -1.68 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.89 1974 1564 120.1 — — — — -36 +43 — 44.6% -0.46 2–5 (29%) 3–1 (75%) 97.9 +0.85
19 1982 1629 117.0 — — — — — +36 +60 59.3% +0.70 8–2 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 106.2 +1.74 1975 1759 130.6 — — — — -20 -115 -113 57.1% +0.64 10–10 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 100.9 +2.59
20 1983 1755 135.9 — — — — -170 -34 +77 54.4% +0.25 8–5 (62%) 3–3 (50%) 104.5 +2.04 1976 1897 148.1 — — — — +31 -249 -165 59.2% +0.31 4–4 (50%) 8–4 (67%) 105.5 -3.36
21 1984 1766 123.0 — — — — -246 -130 +139 45.6% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.6 -1.30 1977 1943 148.6 — — — — -3 — -137 51.5% +0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.6 -5.31
22 1985 1730 128.2 — — — — -158 — +131 47.1% -0.38 7–8 (47%) 3–3 (50%) 99.5 -0.26 1978 1867 129.3 — — — — -10 — -63 37.5% -0.92 1–5 (17%) 1–3 (25%) 94.0 -1.91
23 1986 1669 119.1 — — — — -123 -108 +185 38.5% -0.67 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 96.1 -0.67 1979 1833 140.5 — — — — -1 — — 49.3% +0.03 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 98.2 -0.76
24 1987 1748 133.3 — — — — -128 — +163 57.7% +0.17 5–5 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.3 +0.17 1980 1827 148.3 — — — — +10 — -7 52.0% +0.20 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 105.6 -3.51
25 1988 1607 97.6 — — — — -89 — +199 25.7% -1.91 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 102.1 +1.24 1981 1674 108.7 — — — — +74 — +80 30.3% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.08
26 1989 1682 124.9 — — — — -33 -171 +107 47.1% -0.16 10–6 (63%) 5–7 (42%) 101.1 +1.69 1982 1640 94.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 1–0 — -0.01
27 1990 1666 124.4 — — — — +4 — +122 47.1% -0.23 7–3 (70%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 +0.59 1983 1680 131.9 — — — — +15 — +102 57.1% +0.28 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +1.29
28 1991 1613 115.0 — — — — -43 — +187 37.9% -1.31 4–4 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 103.0 -0.32 1984 1678 119.9 — — — — +9 — +70 46.8% -0.44 9–6 (60%) 4–6 (40%) 100.8 +1.92
29 1992 1600 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01 1985 1609 119.2 — — — — +25 — +87 40.7% -0.75 4–5 (44%) 1–5 (17%) 98.1 +0.39
30 1993 1550 117.2 — — — — -36 — +259 37.0% -0.70 4–6 (40%) 0–2 — +0.46 1986 1629 114.9 — — — — -5 — +91 40.7% -0.70 2–1 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 100.2 +0.22
31 1994 1515 99.5 — — — — -31 — +232 31.6% -1.79 1–2 (33%) — — +0.11 1987 1512 88.0 — — — — +45 — +94 5.3% -3.53 0–1 0–1 — +0.17
Career — 1824 127.4 — — — — -80 -43 +132 46.2% -0.37 67–54 (55%) 30–38 (44%) 100.0 +2.21 — 1946 138.7 — — — — +11 -62 -19 48.8% -0.14 51–55 (48%) 33–39 (46%) 98.8 -1.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.