H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Liz Smylie vs Wiltrud Probst H2H: 2-1
Liz Smylie holds a 2–1 lead over Wiltrud Probst in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Liz Smylie leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Wiltrud Probst leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Wiltrud Probst won the 1989 Berlin second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 1989* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Wiltrud Probst | 6-3 6-2 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
| Feb 9, 1989* | Wellington | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Liz Smylie | 6-1 6-2 | Wiltrud Probst | Match data |
| Aug 17, 1987 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Liz Smylie | 6-4 7-6 | Wiltrud Probst | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liz Smylie | #501 | #20 | 29 | 1,824 | 161 | 188 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Wiltrud Probst | #794 | #31 | 344 | 1,757 | 119 | 161 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Liz Smylie | Wiltrud Probst | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1980 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #80 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #36 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1985 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1986 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #114 | 1,669 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1987 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #27 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #105 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #69 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1989 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,616 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #113 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1991 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,599 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1993 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #125 | 1,550 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #192 | 1,515 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |