H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Liz Smylie vs Zina Garrison H2H: 0-5
Zina Garrison holds a 5–0 lead over Liz Smylie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 3–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1991 Key Biscayne third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
5
5 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 1991* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Zina Garrison | 6-4 6-1 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
| Feb 19, 1990 | Washington | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Zina Garrison | 6-0 6-1 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
| Nov 4, 1989* | Worcester | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Zina Garrison | 6-1 7-6 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
| May 8, 1986* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Zina Garrison | 7-5 6-0 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
| Sep 27, 1984* | New Orleans | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Zina Garrison | 6-3 6-0 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liz Smylie | #501 | #20 | 29 | 1,824 | 161 | 188 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Zina Garrison | #318 | #4 | 134 | 2,142 | 581 | 268 | 68.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Liz Smylie | Zina Garrison | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1980 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1981 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1982 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1983 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #9 | 2,012 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #36 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #8 | 2,032 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1985 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,999 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1986 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #114 | 1,669 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1987 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #27 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,021 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,130 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1989 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 2,039 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,963 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1991 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #18 | 1,924 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,599 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,995 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | 1993 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #125 | 1,550 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #192 | 1,515 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #22 | 1,868 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #273 | 1,704 | 0 | 15 |