H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Ann Grossman H2H: 3-1

Lori Mcneil holds a 3–1 lead over Ann Grossman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1992 Philadelphia third round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Ann Grossman
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 12, 1992* Philadelphia WTA 250 R32 Carpet Lori Mcneil #20 6-2 6-1 Ann Grossman #34 Match data
May 24, 1991* Strasbourg WTA 500 R16 Clay Lori Mcneil #23 6-2 6-3 Ann Grossman #42 Match data
Aug 9, 1990* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Hard Ann Grossman #52 6-1 6-4 Lori Mcneil #34 Match data
Oct 22, 1988* Nashville WTA 250 QF Hard Lori Mcneil #12 7-6 6-1 Ann Grossman #62 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11
Ann Grossman #343 #29 384 1,888 187 185 50.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lori Mcneil Ann Grossman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% #378 1,497 0 0
17 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1 1988 15–12 55.6% #48 1,699 0 0
18 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1 1989 23–20 53.5% #54 1,736 0 0
19 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1 1990 23–22 51.1% #50 1,749 0 0
20 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1 1991 12–19 38.7% #89 1,636 0 0
21 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1 1992 23–17 57.5% #36 1,734 0 0
22 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3 1993 30–19 61.2% #35 1,810 0 0
23 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3 1994 27–21 56.2% #37 1,853 0 0
24 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5 1995 12–19 38.7% #88 1,681 0 0
25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6 1996 10–14 41.7% #72 1,664 0 0
26 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6 1997 10–17 37.0% #75 1,615 0 0
27 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8 1998 2–4 33.3% #283 1,595 0 0
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11 — — — — — — —
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11 — — — — — — —
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11 — — — — — — —