H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Christina Singer H2H: 0-1

Christina Singer holds a 1–0 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Christina Singer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Christina Singer won the 1996 Birmingham round of 16 6-3 1-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Christina Singer
GER Age 58 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Christina Singer #63 6-3 1-6 6-3 Lori Mcneil #35 Match data Jun 14, 1996* R16 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Christina Singer #892 #41 163 1,738 56 86 39.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lori Mcneil Christina Singer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1 1986 1–1 50.0% #163 1,506 0 0
18 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1 1987 7–8 46.7% #85 1,557 0 0
19 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1 1988 4–12 25.0% #160 1,487 0 0
20 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1 1989 1–4 20.0% #264 1,448 0 0
21 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3 1991 0–1 0.0% #199 1,434 0 0
23 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3 — — — — — — —
24 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5 1993 10–13 43.5% #80 1,564 0 0
25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6 1994 10–15 40.0% #77 1,615 0 0
26 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6 1995 17–16 51.5% #54 1,708 0 0
27 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8 1996 6–15 28.6% #136 1,581 0 0
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9 1997 0–1 0.0% #504 1,568 0 0
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11 — — — — — — —
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11 — — — — — — —
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,670 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lori Mcneil Christina Singer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 1 6 7 14.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1993 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1994 6 7 13 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 1996 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7% 1997 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2% — 24 37 61 39.3% 7 24 31 22.6% 16 13 29 55.2% 9 12 21 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lori Mcneil Christina Singer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24 1986 1507 99.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 — — +0.24
18 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35 1987 1558 114.7 — — — — +60 -20 — 42.4% -0.33 3–0 (100%) 2–3 (40%) 104.0 +1.17
19 1983 1569 107.1 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06 1988 1488 107.6 — — — — +35 0 +99 28.6% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +1.48
20 1984 1608 115.2 — — — — +12 -54 +10 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.27 1989 1449 92.5 — — — — — -4 — 18.2% -2.36 1–0 0–1 — +0.84
21 1985 1587 118.3 — — — — +22 -103 +5 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1986 1884 144.9 — — — — -9 -341 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.49 1991 1435 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.15
23 1987 2007 158.4 — — — — +54 -355 -205 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1988 1901 142.6 — — — — +37 -185 +39 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +2.06 1993 1564 129.1 — — — — +59 -131 — 44.0% -0.56 2–2 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 103.0 +0.51
25 1989 1760 134.7 — — — — +60 -78 +79 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.23 1994 1616 129.7 — — — — +55 -196 -15 40.0% -0.82 6–4 (60%) 0–2 — +0.29
26 1990 1695 134.9 — — — — +14 -74 +200 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80 1995 1709 128.0 — — — — -57 -277 +23 50.0% -0.33 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 104.9 -0.60
27 1991 1870 151.0 — — — — +12 -241 +42 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74 1996 1582 110.5 — — — — -22 — +191 34.0% -1.20 3–5 (38%) 1–0 — +0.09
28 1992 1962 156.8 — — — — -4 -303 +76 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46 1997 1568 100.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.14
29 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 1871 145.9 — — — — -58 -207 +244 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +384 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +315 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2025 149.2 — — — — +14 -212 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.11 — 1738 124.4 — — — — +15 -81 +66 39.7% -0.82 21–15 (58%) 11–12 (48%) 105.4 +3.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.