H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Claudia Porwik H2H: 2-0

Lori Mcneil holds a 2–0 lead over Claudia Porwik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1990 Eastbourne second round 4-6 6-2 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Claudia Porwik
GER Age 57

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 20, 1990* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Lori Mcneil #48 4-6 6-2 7-6 Claudia Porwik #30 Match data
Aug 18, 1989* Albuquerque WTA 250 R16 Hard Lori Mcneil #26 6-3 7-5 Claudia Porwik #82 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11
Claudia Porwik #579 #29 148 1,788 114 146 43.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lori Mcneil Claudia Porwik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1 1986 6–5 54.5% #96 1,576 0 0
18 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1 1987 13–19 40.6% #104 1,582 0 0
19 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1 1988 11–16 40.7% #68 1,572 0 0
20 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1 1989 19–18 51.4% #75 1,662 0 0
21 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1 1990 18–17 51.4% #29 1,667 0 0
22 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3 1991 14–20 41.2% #80 1,645 0 0
23 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3 1992 12–18 40.0% #98 1,599 0 0
24 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5 1993 13–20 39.4% #92 1,599 0 0
25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6 1994 0–1 0.0% #256 1,583 0 0
26 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6 1995 4–7 36.4% #133 1,550 0 0
27 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8 1996 4–5 44.4% #153 1,562 0 0
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11 — — — — — — —
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11 — — — — — — —
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11 — — — — — — —