H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Elna Reinach H2H: 6-0

Lori Mcneil holds a 6–0 lead over Elna Reinach in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lori Mcneil leads 3–0 on grass and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1995 Birmingham semifinal 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main draw meetings
Elna Reinach
RSA Age 57

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 17, 1995* Birmingham WTA 250 SF Grass Lori Mcneil #28 6-4 6-4 Elna Reinach #82 Match data
Feb 21, 1992* Oklahoma WTA 250 R16 Hard Lori Mcneil #22 6-4 6-2 Elna Reinach #74 Match data
Feb 13, 1992* Chicago WTA 250 R32 Carpet Lori Mcneil #22 6-4 6-2 Elna Reinach #66 Match data
Jun 13, 1990* Birmingham WTA 250 R64 Grass Lori Mcneil #52 7-6 6-4 Elna Reinach #70 Match data
Aug 20, 1989* Albuquerque WTA 250 F Hard Lori Mcneil #26 6-1 6-3 Elna Reinach #57 Match data
Jul 17, 1986* Newport WTA 250 R32 Grass Lori Mcneil #57 7-6 6-3 Elna Reinach #104 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11
Elna Reinach #342 #26 33 1,865 145 170 46.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lori Mcneil Elna Reinach
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1984 0–1 0.0% #273 1,495 0 0
16 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1985 0–1 0.0% #205 1,493 0 0
17 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1 1986 14–12 53.8% #56 1,670 0 0
18 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1 1987 10–21 32.3% #95 1,636 0 0
19 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1 1988 26–15 63.4% #28 1,812 0 0
20 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1 1989 16–17 48.5% #56 1,775 0 0
21 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1 1990 12–18 40.0% #90 1,714 0 0
22 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3 1991 15–22 40.5% #82 1,705 0 0
23 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3 1992 10–16 38.5% #109 1,655 0 0
24 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5 1993 19–17 52.8% #58 1,707 0 1
25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6 1994 13–15 46.4% #74 1,731 0 1
26 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6 1995 10–15 40.0% #109 1,666 0 1
27 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8 — — — — — — —
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11 — — — — — — —
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11 — — — — — — —
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11 — — — — — — —