H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Elna Reinach H2H: 6-0

Lori Mcneil holds a 6–0 lead over Elna Reinach in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lori Mcneil leads 3–0 on grass and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1995 Birmingham semifinal 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main-draw meetings
Elna Reinach
RSA Age 57

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lori Mcneil #28 6-4 6-4 Elna Reinach #82 Match data Jun 17, 1995* SF Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Lori Mcneil #22 6-4 6-2 Elna Reinach #74 Match data Feb 21, 1992* R16 Oklahoma Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Lori Mcneil #22 6-4 6-2 Elna Reinach #66 Match data Feb 13, 1992* R32 Chicago Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Lori Mcneil #52 7-6 6-4 Elna Reinach #70 Match data Jun 13, 1990* R64 Birmingham Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Lori Mcneil #26 6-1 6-3 Elna Reinach #57 Match data Aug 20, 1989* F Albuquerque WTA 250 Hard
Lori Mcneil #57 7-6 6-3 Elna Reinach #104 Match data Jul 17, 1986* R32 Newport WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lori Mcneil — #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Elna Reinach — #26 33 1,864 145 171 45.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lori Mcneil Elna Reinach
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1984 0–1 0.0% #273 1,495 0 0
16 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1985 0–1 0.0% #205 1,494 0 0
17 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1 1986 14–12 53.8% #56 1,656 0 0
18 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1 1987 10–21 32.3% #95 1,631 0 0
19 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1 1988 26–15 63.4% #28 1,810 0 0
20 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1 1989 16–17 48.5% #56 1,775 0 0
21 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1 1990 12–18 40.0% #90 1,714 0 0
22 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3 1991 15–22 40.5% #82 1,705 0 0
23 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3 1992 10–17 37.0% #109 1,654 0 0
24 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5 1993 19–17 52.8% #58 1,706 0 1
25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6 1994 13–15 46.4% #74 1,730 0 1
26 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6 1995 10–15 40.0% #109 1,665 0 1
27 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8 — — — — — — —
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11 — — — — — — —
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11 — — — — — — —
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,671 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lori Mcneil Elna Reinach
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 9 5 14 64.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
18 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
19 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 13 6 19 68.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 7 8 15 46.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1990 9 10 19 47.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 1991 8 14 22 36.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4% 1992 6 9 15 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1993 12 9 21 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1994 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2% — 78 83 161 48.4% 19 37 56 33.9% 37 34 71 52.1% 11 17 28 39.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lori Mcneil Elna Reinach
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1496 104.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
16 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 1985 1494 101.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.20
17 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24 1986 1657 129.7 — — — — +23 -92 -84 53.6% +0.25 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.2 +0.56
18 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35 1987 1632 140.3 — — — — +4 -124 +12 39.7% -0.55 2–9 (18%) 1–4 (20%) 93.7 -2.90
19 1983 1569 107.2 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06 1988 1810 145.0 — — — — -44 -214 -80 60.0% +0.77 8–5 (62%) 5–4 (56%) 105.9 -0.62
20 1984 1609 115.3 — — — — +12 -55 +9 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.32 1989 1775 141.0 — — — — -7 -178 -39 48.7% -0.08 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.3 -1.35
21 1985 1588 118.5 — — — — +21 -104 +4 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.23 1990 1714 130.8 — — — — +26 -203 +61 44.4% -0.33 4–8 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 95.9 -0.55
22 1986 1885 145.0 — — — — -9 -342 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.25 1991 1706 139.8 — — — — -53 -77 +48 44.4% -0.41 6–10 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 99.3 -3.80
23 1987 2007 158.5 — — — — +54 -354 -204 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.70 1992 1655 132.3 — — — — +4 -67 +80 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 -1.31
24 1988 1902 142.7 — — — — +35 -186 +38 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +1.98 1993 1706 131.0 — — — — +28 -124 +17 52.4% +0.13 6–6 (50%) 1–8 (11%) 94.7 +0.42
25 1989 1761 134.8 — — — — +59 -79 +78 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.28 1994 1731 133.2 — — — — -3 — +12 43.1% -0.62 7–4 (64%) 2–1 (67%) 104.6 -1.92
26 1990 1696 135.0 — — — — +13 -75 +199 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80 1995 1666 126.3 — — — — 0 -139 +127 39.3% -0.46 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 102.1 -1.57
27 1991 1870 151.1 — — — — +12 -241 +44 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 1962 156.9 — — — — -4 -303 +75 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 1872 146.0 — — — — -59 -207 +243 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +385 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +310 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2025 149.3 — — — — +13 -213 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.15 — 1864 143.2 — — — — -4 -139 +16 46.6% -0.19 47–58 (45%) 23–30 (43%) 98.0 -4.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.