H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Emanuela Zardo H2H: 1-1

Lori Mcneil and Emanuela Zardo are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Emanuela Zardo leads 1–0 on clay, while Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emanuela Zardo won the 1994 Hilton Head round of 64 7-6 1-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Emanuela Zardo
SUI Age 56 Left-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Emanuela Zardo #59 7-6 1-6 6-4 Lori Mcneil #22 Match data Mar 30, 1994* R64 Hilton Head Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Lori Mcneil #20 6-1 7-5 Emanuela Zardo #48 Match data Sep 3, 1992* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Emanuela Zardo #976 #27 80 1,756 69 75 47.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lori Mcneil Emanuela Zardo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1 1987 0–1 0.0% #258 1,488 0 0
18 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1 1988 0–1 0.0% #283 1,476 0 0
19 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1 1989 0–3 0.0% #142 1,449 0 0
20 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1 1990 13–12 52.0% #63 1,593 0 0
21 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1 1991 17–11 60.7% #31 1,714 0 1
22 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3 1992 18–15 54.5% #39 1,740 0 1
23 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3 1993 12–16 42.9% #73 1,650 0 1
24 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5 1994 9–13 40.9% #89 1,574 0 1
25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6 1995 0–3 0.0% #181 1,542 0 1
26 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6 — — — — — — —
27 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8 — — — — — — —
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11 — — — — — — —
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11 — — — — — — —
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,670 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lori Mcneil Emanuela Zardo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1991 1 4 5 20.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 15 9 24 62.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4% 1993 3 5 8 37.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1994 6 5 11 54.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1995 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2% — 15 25 40 37.5% 49 38 87 56.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 9 13 30.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lori Mcneil Emanuela Zardo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24 1987 1488 96.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.01
18 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35 1988 1477 101.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.05
19 1983 1569 107.1 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06 1989 1450 99.4 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 — — +0.13
20 1984 1608 115.2 — — — — +12 -54 +10 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.27 1990 1594 122.2 — — — — -34 -2 — 50.9% +0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 102.9 +0.71
21 1985 1587 118.3 — — — — +22 -103 +5 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.20 1991 1714 136.8 — — — — -190 +100 — 58.1% +0.87 4–2 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 101.3 +0.08
22 1986 1884 144.9 — — — — -9 -341 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.49 1992 1741 131.9 — — — — -208 +113 — 51.4% -0.15 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 106.9 -0.32
23 1987 2007 158.4 — — — — +54 -355 -205 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.78 1993 1651 114.5 — — — — -126 +136 — 41.9% -0.50 4–2 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 104.1 +0.44
24 1988 1901 142.6 — — — — +37 -185 +39 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +2.06 1994 1575 109.2 — — — — -11 +87 — 41.7% -0.46 2–2 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 97.3 +1.56
25 1989 1760 134.7 — — — — +60 -78 +79 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.23 1995 1542 100.6 — — — — -20 — — 0.0% -2.83 — 0–1 — -0.22
26 1990 1695 134.9 — — — — +14 -74 +200 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1991 1870 151.0 — — — — +12 -241 +42 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 1962 156.8 — — — — -4 -303 +76 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 1871 145.9 — — — — -58 -207 +244 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +384 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +315 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2025 149.2 — — — — +14 -212 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.11 — 1756 126.9 — — — — -99 +89 — 47.0% -0.14 20–13 (61%) 14–17 (45%) 105.2 +1.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.