H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Emiko Okagawa H2H: 1-0

Lori Mcneil holds a 1–0 lead over Emiko Okagawa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1984 Roland Garros round of 128 7-5 5-7 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Emiko Okagawa
JPN Age 61

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lori Mcneil #111 7-5 5-7 6-1 Emiko Okagawa Match data May 30, 1984* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Emiko Okagawa — — — 1,523 18 39 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lori Mcneil Emiko Okagawa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 1–2 33.3% — 1,482 0 0
16 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 0
17 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,480 0 0
18 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1 1983 0–2 0.0% — 1,454 0 0
19 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1 1984 5–6 45.5% — 1,473 0 0
20 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1 1985 1–8 11.1% — 1,437 0 0
21 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1 1986 3–5 37.5% — 1,458 0 0
22 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3 1987 4–6 40.0% — 1,487 0 0
23 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3 1988 3–4 42.9% — 1,488 0 0
24 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5 — — — — — — —
25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,474 0 0
26 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,458 0 0
27 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8 1992 0–1 0.0% — 1,447 0 0
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11 — — — — — — —
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11 — — — — — — —
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,670 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lori Mcneil Emiko Okagawa
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 1987 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4% 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2% — 12 22 34 35.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lori Mcneil Emiko Okagawa
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 — +0.30
16 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 1981 1476 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.02
17 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24 1982 1481 93.6 — — — — +51 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 — — -0.03
18 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35 1983 1454 93.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.41
19 1983 1569 107.1 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06 1984 1474 103.8 — — — — +63 +71 — 50.0% -0.31 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +1.75
20 1984 1608 115.2 — — — — +12 -54 +10 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.27 1985 1437 95.8 — — — — +60 +70 — 15.0% -2.70 1–1 1–1 — -0.01
21 1985 1587 118.3 — — — — +22 -103 +5 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.20 1986 1458 103.7 — — — — +45 — — 45.0% -0.20 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.89
22 1986 1884 144.9 — — — — -9 -341 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.49 1987 1487 97.6 — — — — +53 — — 38.1% -1.48 1–0 5–0 (100%) — +1.14
23 1987 2007 158.4 — — — — +54 -355 -205 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.78 1988 1489 93.8 — — — — +24 — — 42.9% -1.21 — 1–0 — +1.03
24 1988 1901 142.6 — — — — +37 -185 +39 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +2.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1989 1760 134.7 — — — — +60 -78 +79 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.23 1990 1474 94.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.10
26 1990 1695 134.9 — — — — +14 -74 +200 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80 1991 1458 97.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.22
27 1991 1870 151.0 — — — — +12 -241 +42 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74 1992 1447 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.06
28 1992 1962 156.8 — — — — -4 -303 +76 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 1871 145.9 — — — — -58 -207 +244 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +384 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +315 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2025 149.2 — — — — +14 -212 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.11 — 1524 94.4 — — — — +49 +71 — 35.2% -1.34 5–9 (36%) 10–3 (77%) 103.8 +10.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.