H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Gabriela Sabatini H2H: 2-5

Gabriela Sabatini holds a 5–2 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Gabriela Sabatini leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1993 Eastbourne Open round of 16 7-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 5
7 main-draw meetings
Gabriela Sabatini
ARG Age 56 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lori Mcneil #19 7-6 6-1 Gabriela Sabatini #5 Match data Jun 18, 1993* R16 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Gabriela Sabatini #3 6-3 4-6 7-5 Lori Mcneil #22 Match data Aug 17, 1991* QF Manhattan Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Lori Mcneil #54 6-3 6-4 Gabriela Sabatini #3 Match data Apr 1, 1990* R16 San Antonio Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Gabriela Sabatini #5 6-3 6-3 Lori Mcneil #9 Match data Aug 20, 1988* QF Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Gabriela Sabatini #6 6-2 6-3 Lori Mcneil #11 Match data Nov 7, 1987* QF Worcester WTA 250 Carpet
Gabriela Sabatini #10 6-2 6-3 Lori Mcneil #14 Match data Dec 6, 1986* SF Buenos Aires WTA 250 Clay
Gabriela Sabatini #72 7-5 2-6 6-3 Lori Mcneil #90 Match data Jan 18, 1985* R16 Denver WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lori Mcneil — #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Gabriela Sabatini — #3 228 2,400 613 184 76.9% 1 5 2 10 9 27

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lori Mcneil Gabriela Sabatini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1984 7–5 58.3% #74 1,586 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1985 48–18 72.7% #12 1,947 0 1
16 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1986 49–21 70.0% #10 2,024 0 2
17 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1 1987 62–16 79.5% #6 2,267 0 5
18 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1 1988 65–14 82.3% #4 2,283 0 9
19 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1 1989 58–12 82.9% #3 2,260 0 13
20 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1 1990 49–14 77.8% #5 2,233 1 15
21 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1 1991 62–11 84.9% #3 2,270 1 20
22 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3 1992 65–12 84.4% #3 2,294 1 25
23 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3 1993 51–18 73.9% #5 2,110 1 25
24 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5 1994 42–17 71.2% #7 2,057 1 26
25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6 1995 41–16 71.9% #7 2,063 1 27
26 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6 1996 14–10 58.3% — 1,958 1 27
27 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8 — — — — — — —
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11 — — — — — — —
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11 — — — — — — —
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,671 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lori Mcneil Gabriela Sabatini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 19 7 26 73.1% 23 7 30 76.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 12 6 18 66.7% 19 6 25 76.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 22 5 27 81.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 18 3 21 85.7%
18 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 33 6 39 84.6% 18 3 21 85.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
19 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 25 5 30 83.3% 21 3 24 87.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6%
20 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 21 5 26 80.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% 13 4 17 76.5%
21 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1991 24 5 29 82.8% 21 2 23 91.3% 6 1 7 85.7% 11 3 14 78.6%
22 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 1992 28 6 34 82.4% 23 2 25 92.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 9 3 12 75.0%
23 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4% 1993 22 8 30 73.3% 21 6 27 77.8% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1994 23 8 31 74.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0%
25 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1995 23 7 30 76.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1996 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2% — 264 81 345 76.5% 198 51 249 79.5% 54 16 70 77.1% 97 36 133 72.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lori Mcneil Gabriela Sabatini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1586 111.2 — — — — +20 +29 — 50.0% -0.07 4–0 (100%) 1–0 — +0.63
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1948 156.7 — — — — -81 +18 -326 69.6% +1.39 9–7 (56%) 8–1 (89%) 110.0 +0.94
16 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 1986 2024 163.5 — — — — -79 +47 -252 66.7% +1.36 10–6 (63%) 5–5 (50%) 102.6 -4.35
17 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24 1987 2267 174.8 — — — — -22 -98 -411 74.7% +1.86 10–6 (63%) 7–4 (64%) 107.3 -9.17
18 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35 1988 2283 175.6 — — — — +27 -24 -387 77.7% +2.15 12–7 (63%) 5–5 (50%) 101.3 -6.31
19 1983 1569 107.2 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06 1989 2260 175.5 — — — — +22 +41 — 74.8% +2.16 16–3 (84%) 2–5 (29%) 102.9 -5.07
20 1984 1609 115.3 — — — — +12 -55 +9 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.32 1990 2234 175.3 — — — — +45 +3 -236 74.1% +1.94 8–3 (73%) 9–5 (64%) 101.9 -3.17
21 1985 1588 118.5 — — — — +21 -104 +4 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.23 1991 2271 177.7 — — — — +8 +107 -241 81.0% +2.46 9–2 (82%) 12–3 (80%) 110.2 -3.71
22 1986 1885 145.0 — — — — -9 -342 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.25 1992 2295 179.7 — — — — -29 +164 -171 80.4% +2.52 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 100.7 -3.70
23 1987 2007 158.5 — — — — +54 -354 -204 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.70 1993 2111 172.2 — — — — +8 +274 -2 71.3% +1.82 7–7 (50%) 6–8 (43%) 91.5 -1.15
24 1988 1902 142.7 — — — — +35 -186 +38 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +1.98 1994 2057 164.9 — — — — +46 +124 -5 67.2% +1.39 11–5 (69%) 2–4 (33%) 97.2 -0.85
25 1989 1761 134.8 — — — — +59 -79 +78 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.28 1995 2064 172.1 — — — — +41 +68 +15 71.5% +1.92 3–6 (33%) 6–10 (38%) 88.1 +0.28
26 1990 1696 135.0 — — — — +13 -75 +199 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80 1996 1958 159.9 — — — — +33 — — 58.8% +1.02 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.49
27 1991 1870 151.1 — — — — +12 -241 +44 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 1962 156.9 — — — — -4 -303 +75 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 1872 146.0 — — — — -59 -207 +243 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +385 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +310 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2025 149.3 — — — — +13 -213 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.15 — 2400 176.6 — — — — +4 +66 -221 73.0% +1.86 109–59 (65%) 68–55 (55%) 104.0 -4.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.