H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lori Mcneil vs Ginger Helgeson H2H: 2-1
Lori Mcneil holds a 2–1 lead over Ginger Helgeson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on carpet, while Ginger Helgeson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1993 Montreal third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 1993* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Lori Mcneil | 6-3 6-1 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
| May 12, 1993* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Ginger Helgeson | 6-4 6-3 | Lori Mcneil | Match data |
| Feb 14, 1992* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Lori Mcneil | 7-5 6-7 6-2 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lori Mcneil | #867 | #9 | 303 | 2,032 | 377 | 273 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
| Ginger Helgeson | #467 | #29 | 246 | 1,865 | 94 | 95 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lori Mcneil | Ginger Helgeson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #93 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 54–24 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,017 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #13 | 1,904 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #167 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,760 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #152 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #52 | 1,696 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,870 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #15 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #25 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #17 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,804 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #83 | 1,726 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #301 | 1,655 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #91 | 1,717 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #869 | 1,669 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |