H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Halle Cioffi H2H: 1-1

Lori Mcneil and Halle Cioffi are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on clay, while Halle Cioffi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Halle Cioffi won the 1989 Indianapolis round of 16 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Halle Cioffi
USA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Halle Cioffi #51 7-6 6-3 Lori Mcneil #28 Match data Nov 3, 1989* R16 Indianapolis WTA 250 Hard
Lori Mcneil #11 6-3 7-5 Halle Cioffi #108 Match data May 22, 1987* R16 Geneva WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Halle Cioffi #767 #31 26 1,765 88 98 47.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lori Mcneil Halle Cioffi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1985 6–2 75.0% — 1,550 0 0
16 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1986 2–3 40.0% #147 1,532 0 0
17 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1 1987 16–13 55.2% #55 1,673 0 1
18 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1 1988 14–15 48.3% #47 1,689 0 1
19 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1 1989 17–13 56.7% #50 1,710 0 1
20 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1 1990 9–14 39.1% #111 1,655 0 1
21 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1 1991 14–17 45.2% #87 1,649 0 1
22 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3 1992 10–16 38.5% #95 1,643 0 1
23 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3 1993 0–5 0.0% #348 1,559 0 1
24 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5 — — — — — — —
25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6 — — — — — — —
26 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6 — — — — — — —
27 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8 — — — — — — —
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11 — — — — — — —
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11 — — — — — — —
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,670 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lori Mcneil Halle Cioffi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 10 9 19 52.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 15 11 26 57.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 7 12 19 36.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1991 7 10 17 41.2% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 1992 3 9 12 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4% 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2% — 52 59 111 46.8% 27 27 54 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lori Mcneil Halle Cioffi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1550 107.3 — — — — — — — 63.2% +1.11 3–0 (100%) — — +0.46
16 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 1986 1532 100.6 — — — — +40 — — 40.0% -0.10 — — — +1.17
17 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24 1987 1674 122.2 — — — — -1 -83 — 49.2% -0.26 5–2 (71%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.15
18 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35 1988 1690 131.0 — — — — -14 -40 — 49.2% -0.25 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 97.8 -1.17
19 1983 1569 107.1 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06 1989 1710 128.2 — — — — -6 -30 — 52.7% +0.11 9–5 (64%) 1–1 — +0.21
20 1984 1608 115.2 — — — — +12 -54 +10 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.27 1990 1655 131.1 — — — — -9 — — 43.4% -0.70 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 96.4 -0.35
21 1985 1587 118.3 — — — — +22 -103 +5 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.20 1991 1650 132.0 — — — — -9 +87 — 49.3% -0.04 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 99.9 -1.22
22 1986 1884 144.9 — — — — -9 -341 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.49 1992 1643 129.6 — — — — -40 +97 — 41.0% -0.77 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 99.4 -1.00
23 1987 2007 158.4 — — — — +54 -355 -205 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.78 1993 1559 88.2 — — — — -19 — — 9.1% -3.09 0–1 0–1 — +0.13
24 1988 1901 142.6 — — — — +37 -185 +39 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +2.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1989 1760 134.7 — — — — +60 -78 +79 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1990 1695 134.9 — — — — +14 -74 +200 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1991 1870 151.0 — — — — +12 -241 +42 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 1962 156.8 — — — — -4 -303 +76 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 1871 145.9 — — — — -58 -207 +244 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +384 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +315 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2025 149.2 — — — — +14 -212 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.11 — 1766 131.8 — — — — -10 +17 — 47.3% -0.30 30–27 (53%) 12–12 (50%) 102.5 -1.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.