H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Ines Gorrochategui H2H: 0-1

Ines Gorrochategui holds a 1–0 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ines Gorrochategui leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ines Gorrochategui won the 1996 Eastbourne Open round of 16 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Ines Gorrochategui
ARG Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ines Gorrochategui #83 6-2 6-3 Lori Mcneil #47 Match data Jun 22, 1996* R16 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Ines Gorrochategui #393 #19 484 1,920 109 88 55.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lori Mcneil Ines Gorrochategui
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1 1990 0–1 0.0% #240 1,482 0 0
18 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1 1991 7–3 70.0% #55 1,573 0 0
19 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1 1992 9–9 50.0% #90 1,629 0 0
20 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1 1993 21–17 55.3% #57 1,704 0 0
21 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1 1994 23–11 67.6% #20 1,917 0 0
22 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3 1995 16–12 57.1% #38 1,824 0 0
23 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3 1996 9–8 52.9% #100 1,801 0 0
24 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5 1997 10–14 41.7% #91 1,692 0 0
25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6 1998 0–3 0.0% #275 1,630 0 0
26 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6 1999 14–10 58.3% #70 1,705 0 0
27 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8 — — — — — — —
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11 — — — — — — —
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11 — — — — — — —
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,670 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lori Mcneil Ines Gorrochategui
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — —
20 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 7 7 14 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1994 7 4 11 63.6% 12 5 17 70.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
22 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 1995 4 3 7 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4% 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
24 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1997 3 4 7 42.9% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
27 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2% — 27 29 56 48.2% 56 41 97 57.7% 23 14 37 62.2% 3 4 7 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lori Mcneil Ines Gorrochategui
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24 1990 1482 97.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.17
18 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35 1991 1573 119.4 — — — — — +87 — 68.2% +0.77 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +1.03
19 1983 1569 107.1 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06 1992 1629 122.8 — — — — -111 +90 — 45.2% -0.57 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) 104.7 +0.19
20 1984 1608 115.2 — — — — +12 -54 +10 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.27 1993 1705 129.6 — — — — -109 +60 -68 52.2% -0.09 9–5 (64%) 9–2 (82%) 109.1 -0.14
21 1985 1587 118.3 — — — — +22 -103 +5 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.20 1994 1918 149.2 — — — — -246 +4 -208 66.7% +1.21 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 103.4 -2.07
22 1986 1884 144.9 — — — — -9 -341 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.49 1995 1824 129.2 — — — — -155 +23 -25 52.6% -0.05 3–2 (60%) 4–1 (80%) 104.4 -0.35
23 1987 2007 158.4 — — — — +54 -355 -205 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.78 1996 1801 121.6 — — — — -124 — +65 53.8% -0.23 4–3 (57%) 1–0 — +0.27
24 1988 1901 142.6 — — — — +37 -185 +39 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +2.06 1997 1692 130.7 — — — — -34 +79 +138 46.3% -0.20 1–5 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.81
25 1989 1760 134.7 — — — — +60 -78 +79 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.23 1998 1630 96.0 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.72 0–1 — — +0.39
26 1990 1695 134.9 — — — — +14 -74 +200 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80 1999 1706 132.0 — — — — -77 +72 +111 53.7% +0.50 7–1 (88%) 0–3 (0%) 103.6 -0.11
27 1991 1870 151.0 — — — — +12 -241 +42 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 1962 156.8 — — — — -4 -303 +76 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 1871 145.9 — — — — -58 -207 +244 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +384 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +315 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2025 149.2 — — — — +14 -212 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.11 — 1921 138.4 — — — — -131 +57 -4 53.6% +0.11 35–25 (58%) 24–13 (65%) 112.4 -0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.