H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Laura Arraya H2H: 5-2

Lori Mcneil holds a 5–2 lead over Laura Arraya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Lori Mcneil leads 3–0 on carpet and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1992 Brighton third round 4-6 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Laura Arraya
PER Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 23, 1992* Brighton WTA 250 R32 Carpet Lori Mcneil #17 4-6 6-1 7-5 Laura Arraya #41 Match data
Apr 13, 1991* Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 SF Hard Lori Mcneil #36 7-6 6-3 Laura Arraya #30 Match data
May 30, 1990* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Laura Arraya #18 7-6(5) 6-3 Lori Mcneil #49 Match data
Jul 21, 1989* Newport WTA 250 R16 Grass Laura Arraya #95 7-5 6-2 Lori Mcneil #25 Match data
Oct 11, 1986* Zurich WTA 250 QF Carpet Lori Mcneil #21 7-6 7-5 Laura Arraya #37 Match data
Mar 1, 1986* Oklahoma WTA 250 QF Carpet Lori Mcneil #94 6-3 6-3 Laura Arraya #64 Match data
Feb 6, 1985* Delray Beach WTA 1000 R128 Hard Lori Mcneil #85 7-5 6-2 Laura Arraya #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11
Laura Arraya #192 #14 51 1,922 270 204 57.0% 0 1 0 0 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lori Mcneil Laura Arraya
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1 1981 19–8 70.4% — 1,683 0 4
18 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1 1982 33–17 66.0% — 1,741 0 7
19 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1 1983 23–23 50.0% — 1,713 0 7
20 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1 1984 29–18 61.7% #34 1,760 0 8
21 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1 1985 17–21 44.7% #63 1,693 0 8
22 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3 1986 23–24 48.9% #33 1,718 0 8
23 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3 1987 16–14 53.3% #45 1,770 0 8
24 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5 — — — — — — —
25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6 1989 27–12 69.2% #19 1,882 0 10
26 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6 1990 26–19 57.8% #21 1,821 0 10
27 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8 1991 28–17 62.2% #24 1,823 0 10
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9 1992 20–19 51.3% #45 1,734 0 10
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10 1993 9–12 42.9% #71 1,683 0 10
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11 — — — — — — —
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11 — — — — — — —
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11 — — — — — — —