H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Laura Arraya H2H: 5-2

Lori Mcneil holds a 5–2 lead over Laura Arraya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Lori Mcneil leads 3–0 on carpet and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1992 Brighton round of 32 4-6 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Laura Arraya
PER Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lori Mcneil #17 4-6 6-1 7-5 Laura Arraya #41 Match data Oct 23, 1992* R32 Brighton Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Lori Mcneil #36 7-6 6-3 Laura Arraya #30 Match data Apr 13, 1991* SF Tokyo Japan Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Laura Arraya #18 7-6(5) 6-3 Lori Mcneil #49 Match data May 30, 1990* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Laura Arraya #95 7-5 6-2 Lori Mcneil #25 Match data Jul 21, 1989* R16 Newport WTA 250 Grass
Lori Mcneil #21 7-6 7-5 Laura Arraya #37 Match data Oct 11, 1986* QF Zurich WTA 250 Carpet
Lori Mcneil #94 6-3 6-3 Laura Arraya #64 Match data Mar 1, 1986* QF Oklahoma WTA 250 Carpet
Lori Mcneil #85 7-5 6-2 Laura Arraya #42 Match data Feb 6, 1985* R128 Delray Beach Series Category 4 → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Laura Arraya #192 #14 51 1,922 270 204 57.0% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lori Mcneil Laura Arraya
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1 1981 19–8 70.4% — 1,685 0 4
18 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1 1982 33–17 66.0% — 1,741 0 7
19 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1 1983 23–23 50.0% — 1,712 0 7
20 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1 1984 29–18 61.7% #34 1,759 0 8
21 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1 1985 17–21 44.7% #63 1,691 0 8
22 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3 1986 23–24 48.9% #33 1,718 0 8
23 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3 1987 16–14 53.3% #45 1,770 0 8
24 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5 — — — — — — —
25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6 1989 27–12 69.2% #19 1,882 0 10
26 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6 1990 26–19 57.8% #21 1,821 0 10
27 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8 1991 28–17 62.2% #24 1,823 0 10
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9 1992 20–19 51.3% #45 1,732 0 10
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10 1993 9–12 42.9% #71 1,682 0 10
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11 — — — — — — —
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11 — — — — — — —
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,670 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lori Mcneil Laura Arraya
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 10 6 16 62.5% 23 10 33 69.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 10 8 18 55.6% 10 11 21 47.6% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
20 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 7 7 14 50.0% 19 7 26 73.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1985 9 9 18 50.0% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 1986 3 7 10 30.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
23 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4% 1987 7 5 12 58.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
24 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1989 15 3 18 83.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1990 13 6 19 68.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 1991 18 12 30 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7% 1992 8 9 17 47.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0%
29 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2% — 105 80 185 56.8% 103 73 176 58.5% 16 14 30 53.3% 28 31 59 47.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lori Mcneil Laura Arraya
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24 1981 1685 129.1 — — — — -70 — — 65.6% +0.74 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) — -1.24
18 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35 1982 1742 126.9 — — — — -61 -27 — 62.7% +0.91 10–8 (56%) 8–5 (62%) — +2.71
19 1983 1569 107.1 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06 1983 1713 125.7 — — — — +8 +30 — 51.4% -0.24 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.84
20 1984 1608 115.2 — — — — +12 -54 +10 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.27 1984 1760 130.6 — — — — -102 +141 -132 53.8% +0.03 18–5 (78%) 9–4 (69%) — +0.94
21 1985 1587 118.3 — — — — +22 -103 +5 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.20 1985 1692 124.9 — — — — -2 +60 — 45.1% -0.27 8–7 (53%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.84
22 1986 1884 144.9 — — — — -9 -341 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) — +1.49 1986 1718 138.1 — — — — -26 +100 — 51.0% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.79
23 1987 2007 158.4 — — — — +54 -355 -205 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) — -0.78 1987 1770 133.4 — — — — -31 -11 -184 51.6% +0.05 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) — -2.60
24 1988 1901 142.6 — — — — +37 -185 +39 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) — +2.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1989 1760 134.7 — — — — +60 -78 +79 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.23 1989 1883 136.8 — — — — -8 -146 -254 65.2% +0.79 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.41
26 1990 1695 134.9 — — — — +14 -74 +200 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.80 1990 1821 141.9 — — — — +31 -55 -173 55.4% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.41
27 1991 1870 151.0 — — — — +12 -241 +42 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.74 1991 1823 132.7 — — — — +13 -70 -95 56.9% +0.19 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) — +2.96
28 1992 1962 156.8 — — — — -4 -303 +76 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) — -0.46 1992 1733 139.0 — — — — +2 +53 +3 49.4% +0.06 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) — +1.62
29 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) — -0.38 1993 1682 125.0 — — — — +13 +124 +9 44.0% -0.66 4–4 (50%) 2–0 — -0.06
30 1994 1871 145.9 — — — — -58 -207 +244 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) — -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +384 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) — -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +315 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2025 149.2 — — — — +14 -212 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.11 — 1923 138.4 — — — — -10 +27 -133 54.6% +0.19 90–63 (59%) 50–44 (53%) 104.5 +1.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.