H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Laura Golarsa H2H: 3-0

Lori Mcneil holds a 3–0 lead over Laura Golarsa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lori Mcneil leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1996 Wimbledon first round 6-7 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Laura Golarsa
ITA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 26, 1996* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Lori Mcneil #50 6-7 6-4 6-4 Laura Golarsa #174 Match data
Jun 22, 1990* Eastbourne WTA 250 R16 Grass Lori Mcneil #48 6-3 6-3 Laura Golarsa #43 Match data
Dec 6, 1986* Buenos Aires WTA 250 QF Clay Lori Mcneil #14 6-2 6-2 Laura Golarsa #211 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11
Laura Golarsa #693 #39 436 1,761 127 180 41.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lori Mcneil Laura Golarsa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1 1985 5–1 83.3% #166 1,563 0 1
18 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1 1986 5–5 50.0% #167 1,593 0 1
19 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1 1987 6–10 37.5% #121 1,575 0 1
20 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1 1988 11–14 44.0% #79 1,619 0 1
21 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1 1989 22–18 55.0% #58 1,706 0 1
22 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3 1990 14–16 46.7% #61 1,689 0 1
23 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3 1991 3–13 18.8% #213 1,546 0 1
24 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5 1992 5–10 33.3% #125 1,522 0 1
25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6 1993 17–18 48.6% #69 1,637 0 1
26 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6 1994 13–22 37.1% #112 1,582 0 1
27 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8 1995 5–10 33.3% #149 1,551 0 1
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9 1996 1–8 11.1% #145 1,468 0 1
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10 1997 7–9 43.8% #62 1,532 0 1
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11 1998 10–16 38.5% #94 1,570 0 1
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11 1999 3–10 23.1% #168 1,513 0 1
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11 — — — — — — —
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11 — — — — — — —
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11 — — — — — — —