H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Louise Field H2H: 1-0

Lori Mcneil holds a 1–0 lead over Louise Field in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1991 Aurora round of 32 6-7 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Louise Field
AUS Age 59 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lori Mcneil #38 6-7 6-1 6-2 Louise Field #121 Match data Feb 14, 1991* R32 Aurora Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Louise Field #752 #96 12 1,550 58 121 32.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lori Mcneil Louise Field
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0
16 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1 1984 0–1 0.0% #248 1,485 0 0
18 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1 1985 4–6 40.0% #106 1,517 0 0
19 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1 1986 4–10 28.6% #157 1,479 0 0
20 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1 1987 11–17 39.3% #113 1,453 0 0
21 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1 1988 4–13 23.5% #163 1,412 0 0
22 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3 1989 12–20 37.5% #100 1,542 0 0
23 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3 1990 9–17 34.6% #125 1,522 0 0
24 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5 1991 3–14 17.6% #193 1,435 0 0
25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6 1992 5–9 35.7% #170 1,449 0 0
26 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6 1993 5–10 33.3% #175 1,470 0 0
27 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8 1994 1–3 25.0% #197 1,477 0 0
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11 — — — — — — —
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11 — — — — — — —
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,670 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lori Mcneil Louise Field
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
19 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 3 6 9 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1988 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
22 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 1989 8 13 21 38.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4% 1990 5 8 13 38.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1991 3 10 13 23.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1992 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1993 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2% — 31 61 92 33.7% 7 26 33 21.2% 17 24 41 41.5% 3 7 10 30.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lori Mcneil Louise Field
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.16
16 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24 1984 1485 99.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.09
18 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35 1985 1518 115.3 — — — — — — +108 42.9% -0.86 0–1 — — +0.31
19 1983 1569 107.1 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06 1986 1480 96.1 — — — — +51 +34 — 26.7% -1.53 2–0 0–2 — +1.62
20 1984 1608 115.2 — — — — +12 -54 +10 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.27 1987 1453 103.6 — — — — +25 +36 +129 40.6% -0.91 4–6 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 98.5 +2.84
21 1985 1587 118.3 — — — — +22 -103 +5 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.20 1988 1413 105.2 — — — — +8 +55 +117 30.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 97.9 +1.10
22 1986 1884 144.9 — — — — -9 -341 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.49 1989 1543 115.0 — — — — -45 -110 +60 38.9% -0.89 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 102.8 +0.30
23 1987 2007 158.4 — — — — +54 -355 -205 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.78 1990 1523 107.8 — — — — -25 -143 +110 41.9% -0.52 2–8 (20%) 1–1 — +1.49
24 1988 1901 142.6 — — — — +37 -185 +39 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +2.06 1991 1435 97.6 — — — — +9 -98 — 21.6% -1.87 1–4 (20%) 2–6 (25%) 94.3 +0.83
25 1989 1760 134.7 — — — — +60 -78 +79 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.23 1992 1449 98.4 — — — — +48 — — 38.9% -0.83 4–4 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 103.8 +1.27
26 1990 1695 134.9 — — — — +14 -74 +200 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80 1993 1471 105.2 — — — — +12 — — 34.3% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +0.04
27 1991 1870 151.0 — — — — +12 -241 +42 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74 1994 1477 88.6 — — — — — — — 22.2% -2.55 1–0 0–1 — -0.23
28 1992 1962 156.8 — — — — -4 -303 +76 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 1871 145.9 — — — — -58 -207 +244 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +384 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +315 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2025 149.2 — — — — +14 -212 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.11 — 1551 106.4 — — — — +1 -13 +105 35.6% -1.07 22–33 (40%) 19–24 (44%) 96.1 +5.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.