H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Manon Bollegraf H2H: 5-1

Lori Mcneil holds a 5–1 lead over Manon Bollegraf in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lori Mcneil leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Manon Bollegraf leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1992 Oklahoma semifinal 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Manon Bollegraf
NED Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 22, 1992* Oklahoma WTA 250 SF Hard Lori Mcneil #22 6-3 7-5 Manon Bollegraf #54 Match data
Feb 17, 1991* Aurora WTA 250 F Hard Lori Mcneil #38 6-3 6-4 Manon Bollegraf #34 Match data
Jun 23, 1990* Eastbourne WTA 250 QF Grass Lori Mcneil #48 6-3 1-1 (ret.) Manon Bollegraf #36 Match data
Jun 1, 1989* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Manon Bollegraf #47 6-2 6-1 Lori Mcneil #17 Match data
Mar 21, 1989* Key Biscayne WTA 250 R128 Hard Lori Mcneil #14 6-4 6-3 Manon Bollegraf #50 Match data
Jan 15, 1988* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Lori Mcneil #11 6-4 6-0 Manon Bollegraf #104 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11
Manon Bollegraf #649 #29 34 1,783 96 120 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lori Mcneil Manon Bollegraf
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3 1986 3–3 50.0% #140 1,506 0 0
23 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3 1987 9–12 42.9% #115 1,568 0 0
24 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5 1988 7–13 35.0% #117 1,558 0 0
25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6 1989 21–15 58.3% #38 1,671 0 1
26 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6 1990 20–16 55.6% #33 1,723 0 1
27 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8 1991 13–13 50.0% #49 1,712 0 1
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9 1992 11–10 52.4% #44 1,742 0 1
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10 1993 5–18 21.7% #160 1,539 0 1
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11 1994 5–13 27.8% #109 1,513 0 1
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11 1995 2–7 22.2% #156 1,479 0 1
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11 — — — — — — —
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11 — — — — — — —
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11 — — — — — — —