H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 4-1

Lori Mcneil holds a 4–1 lead over Mareen Louie Harper in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Lori Mcneil leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1989 Tokyo Pan Pacific fourth round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Mareen Louie Harper
Age 65

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 4, 1989* Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 R16 Carpet Lori Mcneil #12 6-4 6-1 Mareen Louie Harper Match data
Aug 7, 1987* San Diego WTA 500 R16 Hard Lori Mcneil #11 5-7 6-3 6-1 Mareen Louie Harper Match data
Jul 16, 1987* Newport WTA 250 R32 Grass Lori Mcneil #11 6-4 6-3 Mareen Louie Harper Match data
Sep 27, 1986* Tulsa WTA 250 QF Hard Lori Mcneil #37 2-6 6-2 6-3 Mareen Louie Harper Match data
Sep 27, 1985* New Orleans WTA 250 R16 Carpet Mareen Louie Harper 6-2 7-6 Lori Mcneil #87 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11
Mareen Louie Harper — — — 1,911 177 239 42.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lori Mcneil Mareen Louie Harper
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1974 2–1 66.7% — 1,523 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,521 0 0
16 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,519 0 0
17 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1 1978 7–12 36.8% — 1,588 0 0
18 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1 1979 4–13 23.5% — 1,567 0 0
19 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1 1980 22–23 48.9% — 1,715 0 0
20 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1 1981 16–20 44.4% — 1,743 0 0
21 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1 1982 9–18 33.3% — 1,654 0 0
22 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3 1983 7–10 41.2% — 1,670 0 0
23 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3 1984 18–17 51.4% — 1,733 0 1
24 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5 1985 29–18 61.7% — 1,777 0 2
25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6 1986 12–17 41.4% — 1,680 0 2
26 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6 1987 9–16 36.0% — 1,625 0 2
27 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8 1988 12–17 41.4% — 1,614 0 2
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9 1989 6–14 30.0% — 1,577 0 2
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10 1990 10–15 40.0% — 1,591 0 2
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11 1991 12–16 42.9% — 1,615 0 2
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11 1992 1–7 12.5% — 1,546 0 2
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11 — — — — — — —
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,537 0 2
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11 — — — — — — —