H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Lori Mcneil vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 1-1
Lori Mcneil and Marianne Werdel Witmeyer are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on grass, while Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1990 Scottsdale third round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 1990* | Scottsdale | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-1 6-0 | Lori Mcneil | Match data |
| Jan 18, 1987* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Lori Mcneil | 6-2 7-5 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lori Mcneil | #867 | #9 | 303 | 2,032 | 377 | 273 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lori Mcneil | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #93 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 54–24 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,017 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #13 | 1,904 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,760 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #52 | 1,696 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,870 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #15 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #25 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #17 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,804 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #83 | 1,726 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #301 | 1,655 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #91 | 1,717 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #869 | 1,669 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |