H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 4-4

Lori Mcneil and Mary Joe Fernandez are tied 4–4 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Mary Joe Fernandez leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1997 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-3.

USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4 4
8 main draw meetings
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 28, 1997* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Mary Joe Fernandez #12 6-2 6-3 Lori Mcneil #93 Match data
May 21, 1994* Strasbourg WTA 500 QF Clay Mary Joe Fernandez #10 6-4 4-6 6-3 Lori Mcneil #24 Match data
Nov 6, 1993* Oakland WTA 250 QF Carpet Lori Mcneil #27 4-6 7-5 6-3 Mary Joe Fernandez #6 Match data
Mar 16, 1993* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R16 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #7 6-4 7-6 Lori Mcneil #21 Match data
Jun 20, 1992* Eastbourne WTA 250 SF Grass Lori Mcneil #25 7-6 6-0 Mary Joe Fernandez #7 Match data
Mar 18, 1991* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #6 6-1 6-2 Lori Mcneil #30 Match data
Nov 6, 1986* Worcester WTA 250 R32 Hard Lori Mcneil #18 3-6 6-2 6-2 Mary Joe Fernandez #23 Match data
Sep 20, 1986* Tampa WTA 250 QF Hard Lori Mcneil #37 6-0 3-6 7-6 Mary Joe Fernandez #23 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lori Mcneil Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 1984 0–2 0.0% 1,475 0 0
13 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 1980 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1981 2–0 100.0% 1,520 0 1 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1982 1–2 33.3% 1,503 0 1 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1983 6–5 54.5% 1,569 0 1 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11