H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Nicole Bradtke H2H: 5-3

Lori Mcneil holds a 5–3 lead over Nicole Bradtke in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nicole Bradtke won the 1993 Oklahoma third round 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
5 – 3
8 main draw meetings
Nicole Bradtke
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 18, 1993* Oklahoma WTA 250 R32 Hard Nicole Bradtke #49 7-5 7-5 Lori Mcneil #17 Match data
Jan 22, 1993* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Nicole Bradtke #60 3-6 6-1 6-1 Lori Mcneil #15 Match data
Feb 22, 1992* Oklahoma WTA 250 QF Hard Lori Mcneil #22 4-6 6-4 7-6(5) Nicole Bradtke #38 Match data
Jan 9, 1991* Sydney WTA 500 R64 Hard Nicole Bradtke #45 6-2 6-4 Lori Mcneil #50 Match data
Feb 3, 1989* Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 R32 Carpet Lori Mcneil #12 7-5 6-2 Nicole Bradtke #29 Match data
Jun 22, 1988* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Lori Mcneil #11 6-3 7-5 Nicole Bradtke #31 Match data
Mar 4, 1988* San Antonio WTA 250 R16 Hard Lori Mcneil #10 6-4 4-6 6-3 Nicole Bradtke #67 Match data
Sep 7, 1987* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Lori Mcneil #12 5-7 6-1 7-6(2) Nicole Bradtke #89 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11
Nicole Bradtke #394 #24 256 1,868 181 162 52.8% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lori Mcneil Nicole Bradtke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1985 1–2 33.3% #147 1,507 0 0
16 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1986 6–5 54.5% #123 1,548 0 0
17 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1 1987 15–19 44.1% #78 1,600 0 0
18 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1 1988 24–17 58.5% #34 1,738 0 0
19 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1 1989 16–17 48.5% #61 1,710 0 0
20 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1 1990 21–20 51.2% #49 1,757 0 0
21 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1 1991 21–19 52.5% #45 1,760 0 0
22 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3 1992 21–17 55.3% #47 1,714 0 1
23 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3 1993 26–14 65.0% #26 1,757 0 2
24 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5 1994 2–5 28.6% #153 1,705 0 2
25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6 1995 21–15 58.3% #37 1,786 0 3
26 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6 1996 6–10 37.5% #94 1,709 0 3
27 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8 1997 1–2 33.3% #394 1,697 0 3
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11 — — — — — — —
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11 — — — — — — —
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11 — — — — — — —