H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 1-0

Lori Mcneil holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Hy Boulais in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1998 Key Biscayne first round 6-0 1-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Patricia Hy Boulais
Age 60 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 20, 1998* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R128 Hard Lori Mcneil #167 6-0 1-6 7-5 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11
Patricia Hy Boulais — — — 1,907 140 163 46.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lori Mcneil Patricia Hy Boulais
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
16 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1 1983 7–8 46.7% — 1,546 0 0
18 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 0
19 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1 1986 8–1 88.9% — 1,633 0 1
21 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1 1987 9–15 37.5% — 1,594 0 1
22 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,530 0 1
23 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3 1989 1–4 20.0% — 1,500 0 1
24 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5 1990 7–7 50.0% — 1,565 0 1
25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6 1991 18–17 51.4% — 1,702 0 1
26 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6 1992 21–15 58.3% — 1,878 0 1
27 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8 1993 21–15 58.3% — 1,852 0 1
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9 1994 15–16 48.4% — 1,756 0 1
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10 1995 11–14 44.0% — 1,691 0 1
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11 1996 9–15 37.5% — 1,678 0 1
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11 1997 12–19 38.7% — 1,660 0 1
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11 1998 1–8 11.1% — 1,571 0 1
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11 — — — — — — —
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11 — — — — — — —