H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Patricia Tarabini H2H: 1-0

Lori Mcneil holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Tarabini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1991 Milan round of 32 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Patricia Tarabini
ARG Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lori Mcneil #19 7-5 6-3 Patricia Tarabini #124 Match data Oct 3, 1991* R32 Milan Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Patricia Tarabini #617 #29 29 1,746 105 123 46.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lori Mcneil Patricia Tarabini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1 1986 8–5 61.5% #108 1,562 0 0
18 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1 1987 14–17 45.2% #65 1,627 0 0
19 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1 1988 17–11 60.7% #36 1,732 0 0
20 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1 1989 18–17 51.4% #60 1,693 0 0
21 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1 1990 12–16 42.9% #74 1,659 0 0
22 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3 1991 9–14 39.1% #100 1,653 0 0
23 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3 1992 8–11 42.1% #126 1,636 0 0
24 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5 1993 12–12 50.0% #60 1,667 0 0
25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6 1994 6–14 30.0% #104 1,581 0 0
26 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6 1995 1–6 14.3% #324 1,517 0 0
27 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8 — — — — — — —
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11 — — — — — — —
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11 — — — — — — —
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,670 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lori Mcneil Patricia Tarabini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — —
18 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 4 5 9 44.4% 10 11 21 47.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 4 2 6 66.7% 13 9 22 59.1% — — — — — — — —
20 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 9 5 14 64.3% 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1990 1 3 4 25.0% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 1991 1 4 5 20.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4% 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1993 0 3 3 0.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1994 1 3 4 25.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1995 1 1 2 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2% — 22 29 51 43.1% 80 82 162 49.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 8 10 20.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lori Mcneil Patricia Tarabini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24 1986 1563 113.7 — — — — — +77 — 58.1% +0.45 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — +2.12
18 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35 1987 1627 119.8 — — — — -43 +13 — 42.9% -0.30 6–4 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 100.2 +1.32
19 1983 1569 107.1 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06 1988 1733 129.7 — — — — -103 +8 — 57.6% +0.36 7–0 (100%) 4–1 (80%) 110.1 -0.68
20 1984 1608 115.2 — — — — +12 -54 +10 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.27 1989 1694 124.4 — — — — -24 +3 — 51.9% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 1–3 (25%) 96.9 +1.92
21 1985 1587 118.3 — — — — +22 -103 +5 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.20 1990 1659 126.4 — — — — -54 +82 — 47.5% -0.25 2–5 (29%) 3–3 (50%) 97.7 -0.18
22 1986 1884 144.9 — — — — -9 -341 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.49 1991 1654 128.2 — — — — -81 +85 — 41.7% -0.42 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -1.50
23 1987 2007 158.4 — — — — +54 -355 -205 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.78 1992 1636 121.0 — — — — -52 +72 — 45.2% -0.43 1–3 (25%) — — -0.08
24 1988 1901 142.6 — — — — +37 -185 +39 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +2.06 1993 1668 128.1 — — — — -154 +126 — 52.9% +0.14 2–3 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.7 +0.16
25 1989 1760 134.7 — — — — +60 -78 +79 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.23 1994 1582 113.6 — — — — -87 +101 — 31.1% -1.64 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 101.9 +0.59
26 1990 1695 134.9 — — — — +14 -74 +200 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80 1995 1518 95.0 — — — — — +66 — 14.3% -2.36 — 0–1 — +0.49
27 1991 1870 151.0 — — — — +12 -241 +42 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 1962 156.8 — — — — -4 -303 +76 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 1871 145.9 — — — — -58 -207 +244 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +384 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +315 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2025 149.2 — — — — +14 -212 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.11 — 1747 128.8 — — — — -62 +59 — 46.8% -0.25 30–28 (52%) 16–18 (47%) 99.4 +1.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.