H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Regina Marsikova H2H: 1-0

Lori Mcneil holds a 1–0 lead over Regina Marsikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1987 Key Biscayne round of 64 4-6 6-2 6-3.

USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lori Mcneil #14 4-6 6-2 6-3 Regina Marsikova Match data Feb 25, 1987* R64 Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lori Mcneil — #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Regina Marsikova — — — 2,036 266 198 57.3% 0 0 0 2 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lori Mcneil Regina Marsikova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1974 0–2 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
16 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1975 5–5 50.0% — 1,581 0 0
17 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1 1976 17–15 53.1% — 1,748 0 1
18 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1 1977 37–17 68.5% — 1,907 0 8
19 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1 1978 56–30 65.1% — 1,953 0 12
20 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1 1979 38–24 61.3% — 1,938 0 12
21 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1 1980 33–22 60.0% — 1,902 0 14
22 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3 1981 34–16 68.0% — 1,998 0 15
23 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3 — — — — — — —
24 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5 — — — — — — —
25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6 — — — — — — —
26 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6 1985 12–16 42.9% — 1,764 0 15
27 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8 1986 15–19 44.1% — 1,720 0 15
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9 1987 14–19 42.4% — 1,672 0 15
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10 1988 4–7 36.4% — 1,605 0 15
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11 1989 1–6 14.3% — 1,541 0 15
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11 — — — — — — —
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11 — — — — — — —
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,671 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lori Mcneil Regina Marsikova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3%
18 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 25 5 30 83.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 17 10 27 63.0% 21 4 25 84.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 11 16 31.3%
20 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 12 7 19 63.2% 17 7 24 70.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
21 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1980 15 7 22 68.2% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1%
22 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 1981 8 4 12 66.7% 25 9 34 73.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1985 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 1986 7 8 15 46.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7% 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
31 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2% — 65 49 114 57.0% 144 74 218 66.1% 32 28 60 53.3% 24 46 70 34.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lori Mcneil Regina Marsikova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1500 116.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.30
16 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 1975 1582 125.6 — — — — +75 +3 — 50.0% +0.04 3–3 (50%) 2–0 — 0.00
17 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24 1976 1748 142.5 — — — — -178 +62 -175 51.3% +0.34 7–7 (50%) 1–8 (11%) 97.4 -1.71
18 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35 1977 1908 143.3 — — — — -346 +115 -246 62.5% +0.85 14–6 (70%) 5–4 (56%) 108.7 +0.40
19 1983 1569 107.2 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06 1978 1953 158.0 — — — — -97 +117 -135 64.0% +0.95 12–9 (57%) 8–6 (57%) 108.6 -6.67
20 1984 1609 115.3 — — — — +12 -55 +9 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.32 1979 1938 147.7 — — — — -80 +153 -92 60.4% +0.53 11–8 (58%) 12–8 (60%) 103.7 -2.57
21 1985 1588 118.5 — — — — +21 -104 +4 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.23 1980 1902 147.9 — — — — -21 +194 — 56.1% +0.38 8–6 (57%) 6–4 (60%) 100.5 -6.24
22 1986 1885 145.0 — — — — -9 -342 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.25 1981 1999 159.4 — — — — -116 +183 — 63.3% +0.90 10–3 (77%) 2–2 (50%) 103.0 -5.46
23 1987 2007 158.5 — — — — +54 -354 -204 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1988 1902 142.7 — — — — +35 -186 +38 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +1.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1989 1761 134.8 — — — — +59 -79 +78 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1990 1696 135.0 — — — — +13 -75 +199 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80 1985 1765 131.6 — — — — +5 +293 -79 49.2% -0.07 0–5 (0%) 6–2 (75%) 94.5 -2.24
27 1991 1870 151.1 — — — — +12 -241 +44 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74 1986 1720 127.0 — — — — +3 +191 — 41.8% -0.58 8–3 (73%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 -2.14
28 1992 1962 156.9 — — — — -4 -303 +75 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46 1987 1673 129.0 — — — — +35 +91 -19 46.1% -0.37 5–7 (42%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -2.64
29 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38 1988 1606 99.5 — — — — — +86 — 33.3% -2.00 2–0 1–0 — +0.61
30 1994 1872 146.0 — — — — -59 -207 +243 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52 1989 1541 97.0 — — — — — +71 — 14.3% -2.21 — 0–1 — +0.26
31 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +385 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +310 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2025 149.3 — — — — +13 -213 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.15 — 2036 150.6 — — — — -67 +139 -142 55.7% +0.35 80–57 (58%) 50–42 (54%) 107.3 -6.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.