H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 1-0

Lori Mcneil holds a 1–0 lead over Sandra Cecchini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1987 Mahwah fourth round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lori Mcneil

USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H

1 – 0

1 main draw meetings

Sandra Cecchini

ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

Date	Tournament	Category	Round	Surface	Winner	Score	Loser	Match
Aug 28, 1987*	Mahwah	WTA 250	R16	Hard	Lori Mcneil #11	6-3 6-3	Sandra Cecchini #33	Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000	Finals	500	250	Titles
Lori Mcneil	#867	#9	303	2,032	377	273	58.0%	0	0	0	0	11	11
Sandra Cecchini	#487	#15	279	1,937	299	215	58.2%	0	0	0	3	8	11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Lori Mcneil							Sandra Cecchini
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
16	1980	0–1	0.0%	—	1,484	0	0	1981	0–2	0.0%	—	1,477	0	0
17	1981	2–0	100.0%	—	1,520	0	1	1982	2–2	50.0%	—	1,485	0	0
18	1982	1–2	33.3%	—	1,503	0	1	1983	1–1	50.0%	—	1,497	0	0
19	1983	6–5	54.5%	—	1,569	0	1	1984	17–15	53.1%	#49	1,651	0	1
20	1984	7–11	38.9%	#97	1,609	0	1	1985	22–19	53.7%	#49	1,746	0	2
21	1985	13–23	36.1%	#93	1,587	0	1	1986	15–19	44.1%	#73	1,635	0	3
22	1986	42–22	65.6%	#14	1,884	0	3	1987	36–16	69.2%	#18	1,860	0	5
23	1987	54–24	69.2%	#11	2,017	0	3	1988	34–14	70.8%	#21	1,845	0	7
24	1988	46–20	69.7%	#13	1,904	0	5	1989	28–15	65.1%	#26	1,798	0	8
25	1989	24–22	52.2%	#36	1,760	0	6	1990	26–14	65.0%	#20	1,815	0	9
26	1990	17–20	45.9%	#52	1,696	0	6	1991	22–13	62.9%	#27	1,776	0	10
27	1991	39–21	65.0%	#19	1,870	0	8	1992	23–15	60.5%	#34	1,824	0	11
28	1992	37–20	64.9%	#15	1,962	0	9	1993	18–15	54.5%	#56	1,725	0	11
29	1993	27–19	58.7%	#25	1,898	0	10	1994	28–16	63.6%	#33	1,840	0	11
30	1994	26–15	63.4%	#17	1,871	0	11	1995	9–14	39.1%	#108	1,661	0	11
31	1995	19–19	50.0%	#34	1,804	0	11	1996	10–10	50.0%	#80	1,629	0	11
32	1996	8–14	36.4%	#83	1,726	0	11	1997	4–7	36.4%	#206	1,610	0	11
33	1997	1–7	12.5%	#301	1,655	0	11	1998	4–8	33.3%	#200	1,556	0	11
34	1998	8–6	57.1%	#91	1,717	0	11	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	1999	0–2	0.0%	#869	1,669	0	11	—	—	—	—	—	—	—