H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Tami Whitlinger Jones H2H: 4-1

Lori Mcneil holds a 4–1 lead over Tami Whitlinger Jones in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lori Mcneil leads 3–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1995 Eastbourne third round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Tami Whitlinger Jones
USA Age 57

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 22, 1995* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Lori Mcneil #23 6-3 6-3 Tami Whitlinger Jones Match data
Aug 12, 1993* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R32 Hard Lori Mcneil #23 6-1 6-2 Tami Whitlinger Jones Match data
Jun 17, 1993* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Lori Mcneil #19 6-2 7-5 Tami Whitlinger Jones Match data
Jun 20, 1991* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Lori Mcneil #24 6-3 6-7 6-1 Tami Whitlinger Jones Match data
Aug 9, 1989* Los Angeles WTA 500 R64 Hard Tami Whitlinger Jones 7-6 6-1 Lori Mcneil #24 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11
Tami Whitlinger Jones — — — 1,786 106 135 44.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lori Mcneil Tami Whitlinger Jones
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
18 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1 1989 4–5 44.4% — 1,525 0 0
21 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1 1990 12–16 42.9% — 1,577 0 0
22 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3 1991 17–18 48.6% — 1,682 0 0
23 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3 1992 13–16 44.8% — 1,645 0 0
24 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5 1993 13–19 40.6% — 1,651 0 0
25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6 1994 16–18 47.1% — 1,729 0 0
26 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6 1995 19–18 51.4% — 1,705 0 0
27 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8 1996 10–13 43.5% — 1,697 0 0
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9 1997 2–11 15.4% — 1,598 0 0
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11 — — — — — — —
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11 — — — — — — —
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11 — — — — — — —